Save it for 4/1 man, that’s a good one!
Save it for 4/1 man, that’s a good one!
Someone was surrounded, their car battered about while they were threatened ....
Exactly how does this contribute to a reactionary echo chamber?
Local news New York 1 interviewed witnesses at the scene, who say they tried to stop the driver and saw him shaking with rage and hyperventilating:
Having read this article ( i.e. consumed it ) shall I feel guilty because it was done unethically?
Trademarked 2010
Not likely since all they are asking is to be able to use a name they’ve had trademarked for 10 years already.
Yeah you haven’t
What’s actually happening is that they are asking a court to let them use a name they trademarked in 2010 so ...... trademark *is* about what’s happening.
They do - since 2010.
They trademarked the name in 2010
They are asking to use a name they trademarked in 2010
I think you missed the step when - in 2010 - they trademarked the name Lady A
Pretty poor rivalry....
Counterpoint - any transaction where both parties agree to terms is ethical.
It’s unfortunate the tip “stop supporting businesses who advertise for Amazon with your labor - get a job elsewhere” was not included.
Having read this article ( i.e. consumed it ) shall I feel guilty because it was done unethically?
“There has never been any truly ethical consumption under capitalism,”
“You know how it is, everyone has a Cousin.”
La Mante - pretty good! Had me rolling my eyes expecting the next formulaic next step and then surprised.