Her statements are evidence. Her accusation is evidence if it contains enough facts to say an act occurred.

As someone who’s seen plenty of child rape cases, you have no idea how much the system is stacked against the victims. Even children.

Thank you. It’s really irritating to see people play junior lawyer who have no clue what they are talking about.

If that’s your definition of evidence, there’s also no evidence that he didn’t rape her. Cuts both ways.

Most people are convicted for most crimes based on other’s statements. Hard physical evidence is rare. Thank you Jerry Bruckheimer and CSI for making people think otherwise.

“3: The accused was aware the accuser did not or was not in a position to consent.”