notoriousEIC
notoriousEIC
notoriousEIC

I think the biggest problem here is that you're basically an automotive prude. The C7 Z06 is a reflection of current style and performance expectations. It's what people (especially buyers of these sorts of cars) want today. You, however, think the good old days were better. To each his own, but this car is bad ass

"Really? The ZR1 doesn't have vents, a huge splitter or a wing and it's way more track capable than a base C7."

First off, they haven't only been serious about performance since the C5. The Z06 moniker goes back to the C2 and was a track-specific package, and Chevrolet has been building Corvettes to appeal to amateur and pro racers since almost the beginning.

For some reason you're losing sight of the fact that there's more than one flavor of Corvette across the model range (In the last generation there were three). You don't like the looks of this Z06; that's fine, I get it. But lots of other people, myself included, do. And fortunately for all of us we have options. But

Beauty should not be a sports cars top priority, performance should. To think otherwise promotes style over substance.

You can count me among the people that loved Rage as well. I didn't even have a problem with the story or the ending, aside from just wanting more. The "Scorchers" DLC was also well worth $5.

I'm sorry, but I don't know why you'd name your kid Tali'Zorah (or any other unusual name from pop culture) unless you were just trying to bring attention to yourself. This poor kid is going to pay for her parents' 15 minutes of fame for the rest of her life.

I'm not complaining, but just how does Sony manage to give away the games they do on PS+? The recent offerings have been pretty incredible.

Del Toro is currently mulling a sequel. The movie didn't do great domestically, but made enough money overseas to justify looking into a sequel, and financing would probably mostly come from overseas.

It got the city of my birth correct (Seattle), but I actually mostly grew up in another state (California) before moving back to near where I was born.

I can't believe I had to scroll this far down to see that someone finally nominated Robotech, which is the only correct answer to this question.

I kind of feel like the Uncharted games have been graded on a bit of a curve. Don't get me wrong, I think the games have been a lot of fun, but I also feel like they've had some gameplay and story flaws that people are too willing to overlook because the games are cinematic and enthralling and make us feel like we're

Bioshock should never be removed. From any best list. Ever.

I'd love to see a whole Halo game devoted just to vehicle combat.

Have to cast my vote for Viva Pinata as well. People want to look down on the series, say it's for kids or too cartoony, but it's incredibly engaging and a great change of pace from all the guns and explosions and car chases you find in almost every other game.

That isn't the fault of the consoles. The obligation is on the developers, and if they don't put in the effort you should blame them, not the consoles for existing.

I'm fully aware that many games are graphically superior on PC, and you know what, I don't in any way feel like I'm missing out.

I don't feel "held back" by my Xbox 360 or PS3, nor do most console gamers. Nor do either of those consoles have anything to do with the state of PC game development. If a PC developer wants to make an incredible looking game for PC nothing is going to stop them, other than their own limitations, and the limitations

I really don't get this stupid "consoles are holding PC games back" argument. According to you, Project Cars is a better game, so where exactly is the evidence that its developers were held back? In actuality the only thing holding PC developers back is PC developers.

Because college kids are the stupidest people on Earth, plain and simple. I couldn't believe how dumb and naive all the students were when I went back to school in my 30s.