notonmywatchmyfriend
notonmywatchmyfriend
notonmywatchmyfriend

You’ve got stuff like Read Only Memories, Gone Home, Hero Generations, The Novelist. Pretty nice games. You can check it for yourself.

Care to back your bullshit up with some fake news.

Uh. ACLU is pretty great about defending civil liberties even when you wish they wouldn’t. Want to elaborate?

Yeah, she says stuff like that after non-white people call her out for the racist depictions of, say, Asians in her show.

If you like a slow, meditative experience, pretty visuals, and well, space in general, for sure get it. It’s not for everyone, but it’s definitely a lot of peoples’ cup of tea.

These are pirates, thieves. Do you really thing that they are paying for anything if they can help it? Short of just bricking the unit with the game, banning them in this matter is fantastic. 

Nintendo doesn’t want scumbags as customers. It’s quite clear, and justified.

If they’re not paying for Sun/Moon in the first place...

I’ve never felt awkward buying condoms, and I don’t understand why anyone ever would (unless you were like 15 years old). Everyone has sex. And you should be commended for practicing safe sex.

I really don’t understand why it’s awkward to buy condoms. Just buy them and leave. Same for guys buying tampons, Pads, cups, etc... Just buy it and leave. If that old lady in the lane next to you stares at you, hold them up with pride and stare back.
I seriously did that to an old lady who hardcore glared at me. She

nah

So it shouldn’t exist because you disagree with what you think it accomplishes?

Counterpoint: it wasn’t exaggerated enough.

it just makes it seem hopeless.

Seems like it did a pretty good job of educating you on the topic then.

So why not simplify the code even more, and make bi men a thing? Why create all these different sets of code for men and women? You really don’t need to. 

“Sylvester said that bi-curiosity is “quite asymmetrical between sexes.” Bisexual men are uncommon in his experience and, from what he’s seen, end up only dating other men.”

Neither I, nor the original article, attack his belief system. In fact, the original article goes to great pains to say that the realities of the code do not necessarily reflect the beliefs of the developer. The only person who stated that they did was the developer himself. However, the code itself is not above

As a professional software developer, I’m really confused by this comment. The story had absolutely nothing to do with the names of variables. Any variable names presented in the article are just pseudo code representations of what the actual C# code is doing.

Isn’t the argument less about the code existing or even the discernible effects of it and more about the way he defines his variables based on his perceptions? I’m basing this on the fact that he decided to defend his perceptions before saying that it doesn’t matter anyway because of what actually manifests in the

But the part he’s claiming is a bug is something he also is defending (he explicitly says bi men don’t exist).