Perfect. Replace one human perversion with another. I'm sure the problem will be solved any minute now.
Perfect. Replace one human perversion with another. I'm sure the problem will be solved any minute now.
She should have mentioned intersectionality. Being a woman is not enough to have thoughts about femaleness and the social experience of being female.
That would make the sales tax unconstitutional! Which... okay. Sales taxes are freaking regressive, so why not?
I sincerely don’t know. Probably. Essentially, you would end up with a law that said “no one in colorado will define ‘sex discrimination’ as anything more than discrimination based on assigned sex at birth”. Doesn’t sound like it would have caused issues back then, or even now.
well no...but thanks for playing. I think freedom is the government staying out of private matters unless someone is being harmed. Unless you can make a better case that the government has an interest in ensuring cake and flowers at a wedding.
Are you under the impression that I somehow wasn’t aware I was proposing discrimination? I find the idea that the government can force private business to provide goods/service to someone outrageous...and I don’t care if that is a deeply held religious belief or not.
It is outrageous that this bill is even being suggested...where are the promoters of freedom? If I own a floral shop I should be able to refuse service for whatever reason I want. I wholeheartedly think it is stupid to deny gay weddings your service...but I agree that is your right and that right should be protected…
how dare they support their friend and his side of the story!