;)

the act of selling is political speech, dude or dudette.

now you are seriously peeing me o. stay out of my serious convos cus you are embarrassing me.

because the two are mutually exclusive.

the decision is not political, but the government’s acknowledgment is, and deciding not to participate is political speech. I do not feel that gay people in our society need special protections. I don’t think the government should police our morals. Is a man gay if he kissed a man once? Or just had one gay…

I simply see a free speech issue here. People can get a cake somewhere else. People should be allowed to refuse service for whatever reason they want, in the confines of private business. I see a problem when discrimination is acted upon in the name of the public. I believe this allows people to feel more free. I…

not all people are to be treated with the same rights in society, children, felons, the insane, all are given different rights - but I understand what you mean and will not label that statement a “falsity about historical events,” because I understand what you mean. I feel the same way about “law” vs. “right” which…

ok bro, but before there was legal gay marriage, people felt like there should be, and then it was argued into law. so your issue with my phrasing doesn’t make sense. it is a way to have a conversation without coming off too strong i.e. polite conversation. this can also be seen as an issue of religious freedom and…

sounds like you’ve been eating some unsophisticated cakes dude

KK is soooooo reaaaallll. Awesome for women’s day totes m gotes. sex tape ftw.

It probably took him like 3 months to write this and, that considered, it is not very impressive. “freudian-rich” wtf is that? “oompa loompa”? this is not clever. this is too little too late from an unemployed fuckstick nerd.

That’s what I meant about the EEOC, I hadn’t heard of any cases challenging the classification. If the amendment in Romer had outlawed special status regarding all sexual orientations, do you think it would have satisfied the court? That is what I incorrectly thought was under review in that case.

yea, and then both parents go back to work after like 9 months and leave the kid with nanny for the next 15 years, great plan.

it sucks that america is number one economy, doesnt it? we should change that.

are you a greedy american?

ok, that is what you are saying, but it is my opinion that, given the facts of the situation, one can differentiate between the two. “there is just a cake” sounds like a powerful argument, but it is not so strong in a legal sense, when one considers freedoms of religion and what discrimination is.

so that means when gay marriage was legalized (something I agree with) it was not a new institution? Bakeries did not already provide cakes to gay weddings, and this changed the definition of weddings to something new. These bakeries are just doing what they always did, and this is the type of thing the economy will…

I don’t think either of those statements is true, and gifs are not definitely a good look. Your insistence upon reading the simplification “gay cakes” into what I am saying demonstrates this.

I see what you mean, but the way I remember it Romer wasn’t striking down a discriminatory law, just striking down a law that said gays/lesbians could not be found a protected class - not in itself a discriminatory law until sexuality becomes a protected class. Also, it still holds that sex(ual preference) is not…

If someone is buying a cake for a gay wedding it is reasonable to discern that they are in favor of gay weddings, and if they are buying a cake for a straight wedding they are in favor of straight weddings. Although, yea, that doesn’t quite seem to cut it. But you’re right, this will be interesting to see if it comes…