“his Flash costume will have a “post-apocalyptic” appearance.”
How about a balalaika? (I always used to get those three words confused.)
Mid-fight snack, duh.
The bad guy punches you and then his hand is sticky for like the rest of the afternoon because that honey WILL NOT COME OFF!
There is a small but essential difference between a balaclava and a baklava.
It would be delicious.
Looks everyone came after my thread instead, but, yes, agreed. When the opposition’s argument is basically “OH....OH COME ON!” I feel pretty good in my stance.
I forgive Rob all his click bait SJW nonsense, and his “HAWT Takes” on comics and the errors, mostly because when he is on, he is on. Well... that and he is the only one on I09 that is simpatico with my irrational love of MOTU and Thundarr
That exchange was more interesting than the article. Well done you two.
(Sorry I can’t address this to you and Rob, but I figure I have a better chance of it getting out of the grays with you ...)
Hug it out bitches!
I don’t think you understand how Gawker’s business model works. You do know that this is a website, and not a TV show, right? And that companies don’t get money when you watch their commercials on television? And that advertising works completely differently between different mediums?
I obviously disagree but I appreciate the tempered criticism, which is audience dissatisfaction that is far more compelling to me than the former. Certainly, you are not alone in your opinion (you appear to have at least 153 compatriots at last count) but I’m actually pretty pleased with this piece, which dispenses…
Dammit, now I’m mad because your burn was better. I’ll get you next time, Mystik Spiral!
25 years ago, liberals had no problem saying “I don’t agree with Uncle Luke, but we shouldn’t ban speech because it’s troubling.” Now the Moral Majority has outlets on both sides of the fence.
God yes. I’m so happy to see this upvoted. There is a really bizarre problem where a lot of people in the social justice movement act like sanctimonious evangelical Christians, demanding penatence, refusing to listen to or communicate with others and making it more difficult to convert people to genuinely good causes.
What astonishes me is that the liberal left used to be the side of the political spectrum most concerned with discussion and dialogue. Now the name of the game is exclusively to shame people, and commentators are often far more concenred with being Right (as in correct), and another particular person being Wrong.…
I agree with this. I remember this article from earlier this year: