I don't know anyone, regardless of gender, that likes Jon chapters. I know plenty of people who like Stannis, but not the Davos chapters, where he mostly appears.

heh.

I'd watch the Arya and The Hound Comedy Hour, for sure.

First of all, Bran's story isn't boring. It's just sparse, so far.

Mmmm good God, I don't know how the rest of the country lives with themselves with such a scarcity of literally the best foods possible.

Meh, turnabout is fair play.

All the more reason to not start working for them in the first place.

Consistently better than Amy Poehler, that's for sure.

Parks & Rec fans know that in life, some days we're the April, while other days we're the Ann.

So she's supporting people who, if her views were consistent, actively supported the sexual victimization of a man. That's what.

It actually does, because she's choosing to work for said dickish company. And of course there is a difference, but it's still wrong.

What? They didn't just report the Hulk Hogan tape, they posted the whole damn thing. Hence, generating revenue for themselves. Now, they're saying people shouldn't make revenue even remotely related to these recent leaks. Why is this a difficult concept for you?

Gawker Media is patting these charities on the back for rejecting this kind of money when they've previously gone to court to affirm their right to make money this way. The hypocrisy is on Gawker Media, and its sites. Which is what this whole thread is about.

That's true, what happened to these celebrity women is much closer to what Gawker Media did to Hulk Hogan. So it's still incredibly hypocritical.

Don't forget the time Gawker Media went to court to legally affirm it's right to post illicitly attained video of Hulk Hogan "in the act". Mind boggling indeed.

The sad thing is it's a spectacularly easy joke to make. They should at least make it harder than posting the leaks right here!

We're saying that she should have been treated better than this, from day one.

I'm not defending helicopters and massive manpower. I'm responding to what I perceive as a general sentiment that there wasn't really anything to look into at all.

Amen to that.

I understand the differences. I just don't think a campus security officer necessarily does, or is capable of determining if that's what happened singlehandedly. Hence, why an investigation is appropriate.