Tonight's winners are:
Tonight's winners are:
Destiny just got some huge changes, and today you can get it for just $45.
Not only that, but it eliminates the option to get Crucible gear from any of those factions for people who choose not to play in the shit PVP and for those who do not have PlayStationPlus... there's literally no way to obtain Crucible marks now outside of participating in the chaotic and unfair PVP.
I love how they…
No, they should do what they want as long as they're not fucking over the people they're selling their product to... in this case, a choice of style does not fuck anyone over—it just turns me off, as in personally, as in it's not to my liking, as in that's just, like, my opinion.
I wasn't saying they should do…
This post is a depressing revelation of truth, even in America, and even with the Wii U.
I'm angry. >|-(
"Remember when you just put a cartridge in your SNES and you were playing within seconds?"
It looks like it runs on a tablet engine though...
Major turn off for me.
Reduced Cryptarch reputation gain from Engrams, but reputation reward packages now have an increased chance for Legendary Engrams
...except that there's a 100 mark cap still for every week of grinding; so now you either decide to do it the old way, spending 10 minutes doing a round in a small area picking up the materials you need, or you spend 10 marks out of the 100 you can get in a week, which will take at least about 5 minutes to gather from…
Well, damn... looks like they got an extra $95ish out of me because I wanted to play MCC on release and then couldn't, because it's broke as fuck (including aspects of the single player, you!); and, since I opened the Xboner from Amazon, I couldn't return it for a full refund (although they let me return Halo). So,…
Well, damn... looks like they got an extra $95ish out of me because I wanted to play MCC on release and then…
Just about everything you do in a FPS actuates the rumblers...
Let's see... I won't ever be buying a Samsung phone again because of:
1) My Galaxy S4 feels cheap, and even with an Otter Box Defender, and a LCD screen protector film underneath of that, it somehow cracked on the INSIDE, underneath of the LCD, the protection film, and inside of the Defender... I was using it one day…
I'm really curious to know his process.
I said why in my message... why would they not want a challenge, facing me 1 on 1, if they were not going to quit the match and try to find another one with fair odds?
...
Never mind.
I'm intrigued to see if the Skill Sharing will actually succeed in getting total strangers to stick together and work together.
I hate it when I try to help my teammates and they just continue to mindlessly run about like a one man killing machine chicken with their head cut off, playing CoD... there's only so much…
I got into a match, on a team by myself against 3 reds... GG WP, 343i. It's funny how the 3 guys just constantly teamed up on me, like there's absolutely no care for fairness, or that they didn't quit... like... I thought people played for fun and challenge... not for stats... however, since this happens to me a…
Can you actually tell me what you analyze to be bad about Reach? I'd like to know if you're just going along with the opinions' of certain masses or if you actually have some critiques about aspects of the game. I think Reach is a stronger game than Halo 4.
"...fully fleshed out..."
Simple checkpoint saving doesn't work, where as it does in the prior versions of the games; video proof: http://goo.gl/1kYxok
inb4: "Great... WE'VE WOKEN THE HIVE!"
Except that that tank is just an oversized, more agile Fallen Walker. It even has the same weak points (legs), but no critical opening after each leg is destroyed.