And in a faraway greenroom, a furious Josh Hutcherson rips off the "friends" half of the "best/friends" necklaces that he and Lawrence once bought at the mall. "Lies," he whispers. "All lies."
And in a faraway greenroom, a furious Josh Hutcherson rips off the "friends" half of the "best/friends" necklaces that he and Lawrence once bought at the mall. "Lies," he whispers. "All lies."
I dunno, maybe she thought he had a white woman fetish? It's a passing phrase being used by a person who was raped. I wouldn't read too much into that one singular reference.
But don't get too excited yet—he's going to Philly.
I don't know how true that is, but it makes sense that a bank that pays out $9 billion or whatever is going to slightly increase user fees, etc. to mitigate the cost.
Yeah I'm a little confused on how this timeline works as well.
Who should pay for gay conversion therapy?
But Olbermann takes the next, obvious step:
Well, nowadays you typically get one Hepatitis vaccine before you take the baby to your pediatrician.
To me the goofiest thing about this is that they had to fucking ask the question. I get that it's sort of last minute, but it should be obvious that you do not want these fuckwits delivering your baby.
But as you said, these will bid mid level executives at most. What's more, most of the people who could actually be prosecuted, are no longer with JP Morgan (or most of the other firms) as the structured product units at most of those banks underwent huge shake-ups following 2008.
Yes?
You don't need to be a PhD economist to read a few white papers about some of her more further out proposals written by PhD economists.
I mean, all of these things come from the same pot. I propose that we pay for this by replacing all the food in the Congressional cafeteria with rat poison. Not only would it save us a bunch of money, as rat poison is pretty cheap, it would save us a whole lot more money over the long run by allowing us to fully…
Of course the government can go through years and years of trials. The issue is that I, as a taxpayer, would rather have the $10 billion now than have the government spend hundreds of millions of dollars trying a case with an uncertain outcome.
Sure, maybe, but you're talking about going through a trial for years and years.
JP Morgan alone has been fined again and again and again, most recently another $9 billion for their role in the mortgage crisis. And no one, seemingly, will ever go to jail, no matter how many times the people working for these banks blatantly break the law.
Not true at all. Free agency first came around because enough owners realized that it wasn't going to be bad for their bottom lines.
Assuming that 2/3rds of the players would go along with a plan to walk away to try and find a new ownership group that would be willing to invest the money necessary to put together an adequate league, wrangle out tv contracts and merchandising rights and do so in such a way that the players get a better deal, all…
It's true that NBA players make more money, but the statistics still indicate that 60% of NBA players face bankruptcy or serious financial stress within 5 years of retirement. That's better than the 78% of NFL players that face the same situation, but it also means that turning off the spigot for any length of time…
Okay, this reply to you is somewhat serious.