norweeg
norweeg
norweeg

so spybot S&D wasn't part of the test? I am immediately questioning this test because it's not like it's a bit player in the anti-malware world...

that's my thought too! How can you even prove that he didn't share them? Not available for public download != not shared

because they don't want trans people in their bathrooms because they don't believe in trans people, but it's not okay for trans people to have "special privilege" bathrooms because that's how Fox News thinks

I had nothing but bad experiences with solid-run. I tried to order a cubox from them. Not only did I not receive it 2 months after order it, they tried to pretend that they had notified me that it was backordered. The only communication I received from them was an order confirmation that said allow 2 weeks for

do they get it on the floor enough that there's a noticeable puddle of half-dried pee in front of every toilet in the women's restroom?

not gonna lie...I'd put that in my butt. It has practical anal sex purposes such as knowing for certain you're clean down there so you don't have to douche

agreed. It's like capital investment is completely divorced from the product or service that generates the money that comes back to investors in dividends. Its all about numbers, not considering the future of the product and therefore the future of those dividends. Investors believe more in balance sheets than a

a bubbler is the word for a water fountain in some places, so probably always the latter

I am seeing a lot of Diocese on this list. Wouldn't that make them a church, not a company??

Christian Scientists believe that medicine and Christian Science prayer are incompatible, because they proceed from contradictory assumptions. Medicine asserts that something is physically broken and needs to be fixed, while Christian Science asserts that the spiritual reality is perfect and any belief to the contrary

I know that. I am talking about a hypothetical future case brought before the court where a christian scientist business owner claims they should be exempt from covering medical procedures, such as blood transfusions, which their religion believes are morally wrong, citing this as precedent i.e. claiming that, by the

actually, serious question here: If a corporate "person" can deny this coverage because of religious belief, what's stopping abusive parents from claiming religious belief as grounds for not bringing their sick and dying child to a doctor?

so countdown til a christian scientist challenges covering blood transfusions because of their religion citing this as precedent?

Can someone explain to me what this thing is? I keep seeing it on the internet in clips from what appears to be a professionally produced animation. Is it from a gag segment on some anime??

child me wanted to be on that show and win most of those prizes

maybe she was hoping she was an androgen-insensitive male so she could be a woman but not worry about periods or pregnancy.

disgusting? he thought you pooped yourself and still loved you and when you told him it was menstrual blood, he was indifferent. That's a keeper right there!

he was charged for not registering as a sex offender. It is possible that no one involved knew he was a sex offender

I agree. Sat on a jury where the prosecution's only evidence was a cop's report. Fuck cops. I'm not going to take their word that anyone is guilty of anything. Just another piece of shit trying to justify his bad behavior and paycheck