BACK OFF, RECURSION.
NoRotorNoLove
norotornolove
Ah RUF or as I call them, the video game Porsche.
Maybe they should do a colab; get RUF on the underpinnings (basically the same CF shell etc. used on this) then hand it over to Singer to trim it out, handle the aesthetics etc.
Now playing
It’s entirely pointless comparing RUF and Singer. They exist in different universes. The point is how to secure one of each.
Long before Singer and other outfits were reimagining classic Porsches, there was RUF. Now the standalone automaker…
I didn’t see the movie. What happened? Low tire pressure?
It’s been in “Mexico” street racing all this time.
Not the first legendary American car to end up in Mexico.
Saw it at the Pete. Friend said it would be cool fixed up. Or should I say ex friend.
Yeah, sure, the Charger porno factor of the Bullitt car chase obviously floats my boat. I’ve watched it literally hundreds of times—including once on the big screen due to a re-release umpteen years ago. (Next year: the 50th anniversary of the flick.)
Well the shock towers are reinforced for movie duty and they say the holes in the boot were for a generator back there.
Yes it is.
...the car “almost got made in to an Eleanor.”
Should be a simple matter of counting the hubcaps.
Agreed, but I mean, there’s a bunch of like stunt scene modifications and defects from accidents, in the forum. That would be one hell of a fake.
A related illusion can happen when one side of the image is captured before the other. It’s called the Rolling Shutter Effect.
I always thought that helicopters were just a large collection of parts in close proximity failing to throw themselves at the ground ... :-D
“Yes, rotor speed and frame rate are the culprits here. That’s all you need to know. Absolutely nothing else is going on. Now return to your articles about ‘hooning’ and ‘crack pipes.’”
Another example: