nopenotathing
nopenotathing
nopenotathing

Almost never clearly isn’t enough then, because men expecting all single women they encounter to be on prescription hormones that carry heavy side effects is very much worth analyzing. The pill can be great, but it isn’t suitable for all women, all of the time, and no-one should expect women to automatically be taking

Sure, but if he wants to do that, he should either get a vasectomy and wear condoms, or wear both a male condom and bring/buy a female condom or a contraceptive sponge, or wear a condom and pull out, or any other combo of two birth control methods other than relying on passively expecting that every woman of

I don’t really get his angle there. If he was wearing a condom, why wouldn’t it be fine for you to not be taking hormonal birth control pills? Was he angling for condomless sex with a near-stranger or did he just expect all women to constantly be taking prescription birth control meds, regardless of the various side

The overwhelming majority of the porn industry’s revenue goes to male directors, male producers, male investors, male company owners, male managers etc. Most female performers’ take-home pay is low, particularly given fees and overheads.

Women’s attitudes towards other women, including harmful attitudes, aren’t “the same” as men’s attitudes towards women. Also, dude, you’re not “in the community” of non-hetero women.

It doesn’t seem like Stenberg did “reinforce a crucial conversation of sexuality not only as a spectrum, but something fluid,” though. She said that in her experience identity is fluid and responds to one’s environment, but that her sexuality had been consistently gay—not fluid or changing—but she hadn’t been allowed

You’re really letting the Protestant patriarchy in the North off the hook here. The judge and defence lawyer were both Protestants. Same with the rapists. Who’s leading the charge for anonymity for the accused rapists? Ian Paisley Jr. http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-43578660 They’re rugby players...

The fact that labor regulations make legal voluntary activites illegal to pay someone to do isn’t a sign of imperfect law, unless you think the existence of labor law is imperfect. If labor regulations only banned made things that were already illegal, they would just be a restatement of non-labor law.

Why not do which one, regulate labor or legalise all forms of labour that don’t involve otherwise illegal acts? You’re conflating legalisation and regulation, but labour regulation by definition makes certain kinds of labour illegal.

“Founded in Boston by three self-identified queer black feminists, Demita Frazier, Beverly Smith and Barbara Smith, the Combahee River Collective issued one of the clearest and most effective documents on the intersections of racial, gender and sexual oppression.”

Agreed, but Hitler actually was interested in women, in the sense that he was horribly abusive towards them, including his own niece who he kept basically as a prisoner in his home and sexually abused from when she was a teenager until she committed suicide (or he murdered her/had her murdered, it’s unclear, she died

It’s sadly not uncommon for men to sexually assault women they’re not attracted to as “a joke” (i.e. to humiliate and intimidate the victim). Regardless of what’s going on in this situation, this report:

It would broaden her options at the expense of dishonestly wasting another woman’s time and setting them up for a hurtful rejection.

Right, I’m not defending Manning’s particular political platform—I actually strongly criticised it. But dismissing free hospitals themselves as a “harebrained scheme” like not imprisoning murderers anymore or having completely open borders is nonsense when that system works not just well, but unusually efficiently, in

Of course the National Health Service isn’t free (and who knows where you got your misquote “magic” from). I discussed its cost in my comment. Hospitals are, however, free under the NHS. They’re not the same thing. If you’re going to attempt condescension, you’ll need to read the comments you’re responding to.

Manning is a terrible candidate with a terrible platform, but “make hospitals free” is just having a national health service. Political preferences aside, it isn’t a “harebrained scheme.” Countries like Germany and the UK manage it fine, spending far less than the US for better health outcomes.

Oh, uncited “recent studies” strike again! Amazing their bold claims, amazing their elusiveness....

“Suck some dicks....bitches” is never going to not be an anti-feminist statement, no matter which women it’s directed at. Gender slurs by definition don’t just harm their selected target/s—they degrade all women.

Neither of you comes across well here. It’s obnoxious to complain about your partner’s choice of gift, but it’s also obnoxious to get your partner that’s really just a gift for yourself and the person you think they should be. A gift for a partner that’s you paying both halves of a shared experience should be an

Putting things in bold doesn’t make it true. Speaking of which, interesting refusal to address the choking in your “SHE IS AN ABUSIVE PARTNER” rant. Also, you really need to change your username and try again around here—you’re a semi-well-known anti-woman troll.