nopenotathing
nopenotathing
nopenotathing

You haven’t shown any idea to be wrong and you have employed personal attacks. The average length of pre-divorce marriages doesn’t suggest anything much about post-partum divorce risks. I’m wondering if that is actually a personal photo and not a photo you chose to represent your vibe? Interesting, given that most of

How do you define “so many” and “perfectly healthy”? In any extremely large group, like 51% of the population, there will be a handful of edge cases, but that doesn’t mean that amputations don’t majorly hamper essential biological functions

Far from being dismantled, it wasn’t even answered with any valid data-back-up. Mentioning the strangeness of your persistent ranting about typos, outirght lying, and namecalling isn’t “obsession about your psyche”. It’s something you sign up for when you behave so inappropriately. If it makes you uncomfortable,

Interesting how you’ve given up even trying to answer questions after your first attempt (claiming that because the average pre-divorce marriage length is eight years, there couldn’t be any post-partum increase in likelihood) was shown to be faulty. If you’re claiming that an assertion is demonstrable, you should be

Totally. I also think that the suicide/murder binary fails to account for the fact that a lot of women are made to feel like suicide is their only way to escape from domestic violence without that violence being intensified or redirected towards their family members.

No, amputating a girl’s labia isn’t “kinda close” to a male circumcision, an arguably outdated but still minor procedure developed by men to reduce men’s vulnerability to STDs and skin diseases prior to antibiotics and modern hygiene. What a disgusting thing to say. Own your privilege as someone assigned male at birth

If anyone’s shifting the blame, it’s the person who refuses to address their own weird name-calling and unfounded claims about what the other person supposedly said (“argumentative” etc.). Is your avatar a photograph of you or is it just a stock photo you chose to represent your overall vibe?

Topshop has some casual stuff in cheaper materials at a lower price-point but they’re actually pretty dear for anything silk or anything from their more formal lines.

One’s own personal characteristics? Are you under the impression that I called you names, ranted about your (multiple, by the way) typos, or made up that you denied being argumentative? Stranger and stranger!

Haha! I’m sorry for your health struggles. And I’m still sure you look fab, even if you have a fuller torso area. On the plus side, at least you don’t have to ride in a carriage with your boyfriend’s wife to go get some random dose of laxatives, so maybe a little bit of a silver lining? Fingers crossed that you meet a

No matter how much you name-call, no, you haven’t shown how any data that supports your assertion in response to my question. Your one attempt (claiming that because the average pre-divorce marriage length is eight years, there couldn’t be any post-partum increase in likelihood) was nonsense and instead of trying

It seems that the reason is that the testimonies of children under twelve are collected differently—they very rarely testify directly, for example—so their support services are structured differently. There’s much less emphasis on helping them understand the complexities trial process in the way an adult or teen

It hasn’t been shown that the answer the question is no, though. You’ve attempted once, had that attempt exposed as illogical, and then resorted to insisting that you could show it be no, but you’re too busy writing hundreds and hundreds of words about a single typo, accusing me of saying things I’ve never said, and

Again, a question can’t be right or wrong. If you had any evidence that post-partum divorce rights aren’t heightened, you would have provided it long ago. You wouldn’t have felt some odd need to hedge with name-calling, bizarrely making up things for me to have supposedly denied, and ranting about typos, while vaguely

Information that is given in response to a question has to be organized in response to that question or it isn’t a response to that question. The information you provided doesn’t support your statement and your argument as to why it supposedly did–that the average length of a pre-divorce marriage was longer than the

I’m not disagreeing with you either, I love that you’ve brought up this line of discussion. I found your comment really awesome! What you’re saying totally makes sense. My take is that men always felt a baseline of sureness that they could ultimately use their greater physical strength to maintain control of women’s

That’s such a stretch. The risk of recessive genetic diseases aside, sexual activity between cousins is pretty common in a lot of countries/regions where rural communities tend to be small and geographically isolated and it’s not inherently abusive. Having sex with an adult human being who’s genetically related to you

Interesting. My reaction reading this was that men knew they gained a lot by exerting complete, violent control over women (free, unlimited domestic labor; the ability to force women to gestate and birth their children; the social and economic power to coerce sex from women whenever they liked) and that was why they

My guess is that they prescribed herbal diuretics, herbal laxatives, and placebos. Possibly some herbs that affected the post-partum hormone balance. So maybe that makes the exercise look not quite so bad? (Seriously, though, congrats on the birth! I’m sure you look fab.)

No, your resource doesn’t back up your assertion. The average duration of most pre-divorce marriage isn’t an answer to my question and doesn’t address your claim. And, yes, if you make statistical claims then you should be able to provide relevant statistics.