There’s always a Tweet.
Always.
NopeNaw
nopenaw
Mar-a-lago isn’t far away...
I would even say there’s a good chance he ‘owns’ one of these places. When I say ‘owns’ I mean purchased with Russian cash, as he doesn’t actually have money.
there is also a non-zero chance he’s left without paying and just had them put it on Bobby’s tab.
So there’s like, ZERO chance that Trump hasn’t gone to one of these places, right?
Yeah sorry nope. I don’t buy Steam games anymore, but if I did, approving shit like this would be enough to put me over the edge to stop doing it. Get your pseudo-Libertarian fake sociopath bullshit out of here you creepy freaks. Anyone who had a hand in making this game should have it follow them around like a…
Totally agree - he groomed the parents as much as the boys. Can you imagine how swift justice would have been if Culkin had been the accuser?
It’s not surprising MJ didn’t try this with famous children who already had money that people were paying attention to.
So it is OK to have children sleep in a bed with a grown man even if nothing sexual happened? I think a lot of people would disagree with you.
There were MULTIPLE books on naked children...adult males wouldn’t be interested in that EVER.
lol. You’re acting like Michael Jackson is a regular black man the feds are out to get. Yes, he’s black (technically anyway), but he’s insanely wealthy and powerful. He ran around in the same circles as some of the most powerful people in our society. He has more in common with rich white people than most black people.
FBI and LAPD investigating and choosing not to bring charges DOES NOT mean “innocent.” It means they didn’t think the cases were winnable, particularly in the face of Jackson’s wealth and what that meant for his legal defense. None of that means innocent. None.
And OJ didn’t slaughter two innocent people because a court found him not guilty, right?
When children can give detailed descriptions of birthmarks on the bottom of his penis, then YES.
The FBI doesn’t find people “innocent.” It can find there isn’t enough evidence to pursue criminal charges, which isn’t the same thing.
I dunno man--MJ was pretty obviously obsessed with young boys, and even if all circumstantial evidence is wrong, which I think is unlikely, any sane person would hand stopped behaving the way he did after 1993..
If you want anyone to come around to your view, you have to make a coherent argument on your own. Simply linking to another person’s analysis (who wrote it before having seen the documentary) won’t convince anyone and makes it seem like you are sympathetic to pedophilia. Especially because you have posted multiple…
Bruh...
What’s your point?