Definitely sounds like it. Who knows who’s lurking in the comments sometimes!

Is that all? ‘Cause I feel like that couldn't possibly be all.

They’re polyester. I’m surprised. I thought those prices suggested silk, but no.

And in the definition you give of family values, you see nothing that would harm people, and women in particular? It’s all a bunch of vile values.

That’s a nice catch.

Oh Molly, we didn't win! Obviously there is no God.

Let's hope new charges will be piled on as the investigation continues.

Conservatives are the biggest fans of safe spaces.

A bit Dawkinsian, but I agree with you.

In a nod to my irrational part, I bought two tickets. I felt silly being in line, but I swallowed my pride and did it.

That happens in the heads of woman haters, not in real life.

Adding in some “females” to the industry itself would also do quite a bit for changing that dynamic.

That’s a different story. It’s the very dilemma the writer has been having. You were making a more general point though, and your post came across as if there is doubt something is rape if the victim doesn’t fight off the rapist.

No, the person writing was lucid. I was simply taking issue with your definitions more generally. You can’t define rape as only when the woman is “physically trying to prevent the sex from occuring.” That’s not what rape is.

But the writer didn’t play the cat and mouse game at all.

So “sex” with a person who is unconscious is not rape, according to you (because she isn’t fighting off the man at all)?

Orrr... there is another gentleman involved.

This is indeed one of the most honest things I’ve read here. Rape or not, it’s a disturbing, exploitive scene that never should have happened. I hope the piece of shit is having a horrible life.

Well, she does have some right to frame her own experiences, no? I hope you didn’t break off the relationship based on this story alone.

Yeah, Chelsea sounds insane there. Wondering who came up with the brilliant idea to have her speak on this issue.