looks more like skyrim than wonder woman
looks more like skyrim than wonder woman
I’m going to build such an amazing Ice Wall, believe me, and I’m gonna make Pharrah pay for it.
What has Mercy ever done for this country? She’s not even American. Runs around, healing, which I’m told is “support”, I don’t buy it. Can’t even shoot rockets. Sad!
If I’m fighting armed, I’m using a battle rifle with an underslung grenade launcher. Works great against cavalry and stupid Swiss people with halberds. :P
No, just you.
Hair like Margaery Tyrell.
If he doesn’t want to get hit in the head, maybe he shouldn’t wear a helmet. He’s just asking for it when he’s dressed like that.
Why would I write that this is the greatest action adventure game of the generation and you take that to mean that a website that hired me for the weekend hates a video game?
That...doesn’t automatically nullify any criticisms. :-/
I’m a huge Witcher fan, but Sapkowski’s a dick. He resents the success of the games and everything after Time of Contempt is, uh, not good.
No doubt. But the problem with the article is the fact that it does not advance the conversation about racial prejudice, nor does it provide any sort of reasonable analysis of (or insight into the features of) the game.
You, sir, just won the Comment Olympics. I’m dying.
When reached by Kotaku, the Ford dealership said they didn’t know what we were talking about.
With E3 over, now is as good a time for another friendly reminder that Capcom’s Deep Down is still M.I.A. The last time the game’s website was updated was December 25, 2014, and the last activity on its official Twitter was a retweet from March 23, 2015.
Q: Did the mistakes you made when you were a kid involve you shooting a person with a gun? (y/n)
If you have answered “y” for the above question, please report to a local police station and tell them about it. Your past probably SHOULD be haunting you.
(I kinda get whatcha mean though. But she fuckin' killed a guy.)
No it’s not. “Objective” would be a play-by-play of the facts, untouched by opinions or analysis. An objective version of this article would look something like this: