“I’m sorry to hear that. It was in-fact a jab at the fact that I kept having to tell you what parts of the motion to vacate said, specifically the portion referencing CALEA, after you’d already claimed to have thoroughly read the document. I’ll make my attempts to point out your stupidity more transparent next time so…

So now that you think that the back-door is OBVIOUSLY possible...

“I’m going to pretend you haven’t replied until you actually respond to the last points I made, and stop trying to twist my words.”

Well now your jumping off to another topic...feeling the heat? THe question is if it was possible to have a back door....yes or no?

“There’s still the matter of the encryption debate. I’m done discussing the FBI vs Apple case since there is no case anymore, but I’m perfectly willing to debate the absolute nature of encryption.”

“Lol first you’re unhappy when I decide that the debate is over, and now you’re unhappy that I responded again... make up your mind.”

“I seem to recall you posting a bunch of stuff and then saying I was wrong... but the stuff you posted is mostly untrue, and wasn’t supported by related articles and documents, unlike the majority of the information I’ve posted has been..”

“Why do you want to debate the legality of an order that no longer exists and won’t be enforced?”

As with your AES...it was never mentioned and you are assuming that what Obama was saying was breaking the AES encryption. From what the links on the post said, they were talking about a “back door”. Does that mean breaking the user’s encrypted passcode? Or does that mean creating a universal key? Does creating a…

I am fairly certain you have conceded to the fact that Apple is wrong in this case. You started out mentioning “First Amendment” which was specific to the case. This was the point of discussion until recently. You even posted Apple’s “Motion to Vacate” at the very beginning. There was no doubt this was the…

Hey Dummy...how is my first post inconsistent with the Apple vs FBI case?

“Yes I am denying that.”

“Obama completely 100% ignores the fact that inaccessible encryption already exists in widespread use and there’s no way to ‘take it back’ or force people to use his hypothetical law enforcement accessible kind instead. So even if his system were possible it wouldn’t help law enforcement access anything because…

Are you denying that this entire post is because Obama was answering a question regarding the Apple-FBI case? This entire post is based on it. Everything that he has said on his speech is consistent with this case. You on the other hand, are bringing up AES and truecrypt which was never mentioned at all in the speech.…

“If he’s not talking about encryption algorithms, of which AES is the best and most relevant example for Americans, then what do you think he’s talking about?”

“AES is not an app, mine or otherwise, it is an encryption algorithm. It’s the most commonly used algorithm for storing data at rest, such as on peoples phones or computers. It is undoubtedly what Obama is talking about. What else do you think he could possibly be referring to?”

“a judge can legally charge someone with contempt if they refuse an order to decrypt a file, but they can only order them to decrypt the file in the first place if said person has been charged with a crime and said device belongs to them.”

“Yes he did. Truecrypt is one of many hundreds of applications on the internet, in the iOS App Store, the Google Play Store, and Windows Phone Store, that provides a good AES 256 implementation, which is the exact kind of encryption that Obama is saying can’t be accessed with a warrant.”

“I already explained that a judge can only order someone to unlock a device if said person has been charged with a crime and said device belongs to them.”

Obviously you are. What is so bad about what Obama said in the post? He just said not to take an absolutist view....and that goes both ways....on the encryption side as well as the law enforcement side. You on the other hand said it cannot be done without stepping on Constitutional Rights. Obama, at least said, “I…