Ah, the infamous Rule #34.

That is one awesome SUV. But alas, CP.

Must be Honda day at the Torchinsky residence today.

Reminds me of my dad and I going out driving and while refilling it at the gas station of our supermarket someone in a last-gen (or pre-refresh?) California just parked near the back, grabbed a cart, and headed in. Just like no big deal. Left the top down too.

Can’t argue with that.

Antonov A-40. One built in 1942. One run. Cancelled immediately after. Perhaps you could argue that because it was a cancelled study it doe-OH MY GOD IT’S A FLYING TANK SHUT UP.

Saving that picture for both appropriate and inappropriate times.

No.

Those look straight off a new Cherokee.

What do we have back here? (Not the Highlander[?])

“I will force Queens of the Stone Age to tour North America and North America only, in perpetuity.”

Jesus, I did not realize the LS Hybrid started over 100K. Hell, over 120K.

-Deadest Car Alive

Heard the transmissions went quickly on those.

Definitely. Thanks for your input!

Well...boobs...

Very vaild point. And definitely on the car example too. To some, yeah, the intake would be like “whatever”. Some people though would just solely focus on that and have that be a significant amount of motivation towards their judgement.

That really does work wonders.

I must say, it is interesting (or it says something) that car-oriented people generally vote NP on bikes, yet bike-oriented people find flaws easy, to the point of voting CP or conditional NPs.