I love how fake news tries to call other news fake news. The old “I know you are but what am I” defense.
I love how fake news tries to call other news fake news. The old “I know you are but what am I” defense.
Wow. Go home Wikileaks, you’re drunk.
According to WL’s AMA, they specifically timed their leaks to be the most damaging to Clinton because that’s what their source told them to do. So yeah, fuck them.
Wikileaks also tried to shit on the Intelligence dept for not citing their sources. Beause Wikileaks loves to tell people its sources.
Thanks, me too. You hear about this shit but it never feels real until it happens somewhere nearby. My brother lives in Orlando and was like a half mile from Pulse when that happened. I guess as time goes on there’s going to be more and more folks who this type of things hits really close to.
I believe Esteban Santiago is the first suspect. The bald guy is one of the later people taken into custody.
Har har 5 people died.
This is 15 minutes away from me; my dad just flew out of there yesterday. Nobody really seems to know much about what is currently going on, listening to live news broadcasts currently.
Anyone planning on covering the ongoing shooting at Fort Lauderdale airport or are we just gonna keep talking about the Kardashians.
As awful as the alt-right is for their views about...well, everything, the thing that irks me THE MOST is the way they embrace being an asshole, like it’s their duty to NOT be nice and generally not shitty people. Like the First Amendment doesn’t just give them the opportunity to be annoying dipshits, it practically…
A law already exists, it’s just a misdemeanor, as you said. If he wants stiffer penalties, he hasn’t said so (he’s been very vague). A law against celebratory gunfire specifically when laws against random gunfire exist is like saying we need a law against murdering people at schools despite existing laws already…
It’s a misdemeanor unless it hits someone, in which case it can be upgraded to a felony.
No it doesn’t. The headline says Martinez “wants a law against it”. Which is 100% true. There’s more to the story, but that’s why there’s a story. For the details, you have to read the article. The headline isn’t supposed to tell you everything.
If you click on the related link, the headline isn’t misleading at all. Rep. Martinez wants some vague bill relating to “celebratory gunfire” which is already illegal (although it’s referred to as random gunfire in the law and encompasses things beyond celebratory gunfire). It seems like Martinez is just being angry…
Yeah but that involves things that the NRA hates like actually keeping track of who owns guns. And what the NRA hates so does the government, especially Texas.
According to Wikipedia, there already is a law in Texas regarding it:
4 years if we’re lucky.
Same except I went to college in the 00s. People were still super into Phish. My gf at the time lived in a dorm where the RA let them paint any quote they wanted on the hallway walls. It was like 99% Phish and DMB quotes.
Driving under the influence of impaired driving? DUI and DWI are not the same as reckless or impaired driving. The I in DUI and DWI is “influence” as in “under the influence” as in “under the influence of a drug” as in “if you are not under the influence of a drug, it makes no sense to be charged with a DWI/DUI”.
While this is funny, in all seriousness if you just log out of twitter you can see the tweets of those who blocked you provided they aren’t private. You just can’t comment on them.