Most of these men refuse to lower their standards and date women more “in their league,” so to speak. They think they are owed sex with hot women, and refuse to settle for less. And they refuse to better themselves in order to be deserving of the kind of women they want to fuck

Society’s lack of compassion for incels is not disturbing.

Why doesn’t the US taxpayer foot the bill for ALL healthcare worldwide?

But an even more privileged dude can’t get laid because of his obvious, seething hatred of women - valid. Everyone cry for him. And we should force women to fuck the sort of men who threaten to murder and rape women.

So he’s basically saying these men have a “have sex with me or I’ll murder some people” take on life? And it’s somehow our responsibly to provide that sex in order to protect ourselves and our society from them? Ummmm, k.

So violence doesn’t exist outside guns?

Aren’t they required by law to take all claims seriously....at least until they’ve been evaluated enough to be determined frivolous?

I admit that I haven’t followed the accusations as closely as some, but were there accusations that he had assaulted children? I don’t remember reading any.

You should reconsider what you know about American History if you honestly believe that FDR was “the best President the US ever had”.

Very few people are all good or all bad. I dislike the idea that every organization needs to cleanse all references to the good that someone created because they also did something evil.

That would mean that more than 1 in 8 Americans are sending naked pictures to each other. If 1 in 8 are victims of revenge porn, then what, 50%, 60%, 90% of people are sending naked pictures over the internet?

I’m not trying to be a troll. I’m just saying that it’s important we understand the distinctions. Misusing asylum as immigration is a poor substitute for “fixing” immigration law.

Asylum is intended to be temporary. It’s not meant to be a backdoor to permanent immigration.

Trump ended the program, saying it was illegal. All the courts have done is asked him “How is it illegal?” This is not a political ruling.

You forgot to tell them to suck your dick....though to be fair, when taken together I guess that’s pretty much what this list amounts to.

But the courts are ruling politically here, not on the basis of law. It’s 100% clear that the president has the authority to end by executive order programs that were created by executive order.

If DACA was formed by Executive Action (not legislated) of Barack Obama, then why would the current Chief Executive (Trump) need to explain any kind of rationale for ending it.

And that’s what really breeds all of the animosity from fans. If the Flyers lose 5-4 or 6-4 on an empty net, the fans would be disappointed. But the refs fundamentally changed the shape of this game.

What is she getting out of this, other than coverage and fame.

This means that the test isn’t sufficient to break into the macroeconomic scale, so we find out what happens on a small scale, but we have no *experimental* way of finding out what happens on a large scale.