You can do this as a customer?
I have never thought to do this. But after reading your comment, I think I will start to make a fuss. Now instead of being sad when I see a rude customer causing problems, I can stand up for the waiter or clerk. This will be fun!

Wait, they initially claimed that no frat brothers were involved? What did they suspect, a roving pack of satyrs?

Honestly. The wife works from home 3 days a week and the nanny is probably there while she works at home, like my son is at daycare 5 days a week while I work outside the home. That’s not a luxury: they probably pay much less those of us with full-time daycare do. And someone having who comes in an hour or two twice a…

This. That kind of reasoning is simultaneously grossly insulting to men and completely lets them off the hook for bad behavior. The world is filled with men who aren’t disgusting rapey assholes. Being a misogynistic douchebag isn’t a symptom of being male; it’s a symptom of being a misogynistic douchebag.

That doesn’t count, becuase anger is only an emotion when women do it. When a Man is angry, it’s not an emotion, it’s an expression of his primal man-power. When women do it, it’s a sobby, bitchy, emotion.

i always thought men were so restrained when it came to giving their opinions. thank god for steve harvey—finally some male centered media!

believes in such archaic ideas about the difference between the sexes that there are practically cobwebs dripping off his words.

At some point, as a woman being asked those questions, answering by making fart noises become COMPLETELY OKAY, right?

Oh, I get that entirely as well. It just seems like an illogical reading of the amendment, as if they’re entirely disregarding the entire first clause, and being inconsistent on the final one.

I don’t want to start a “religious war” here, but the constitution places that right into the context of a “well regulated militia”. Regulation (such as licensing) should be fine. It’s explicitly there in the amendment.

Hatroits. I can honestly say I've never heard that one. It fits perfectly. The Christian Taliban Hatriots. It works on so many levels.

Louisiana’s hate crimes statute makes it a crime not just to discriminate against someone based on race, color, or creed, but to commit a property crime that is motivated “because of actual or perceived membership or service in, or employment with, an organization.”

- Caring whether a bar or a restaurant is cool.

Shit, I imagined a group of prisoners being led slowly blinking out into the wild wild woods of Connecticut* while a prison warden whispers “you’re free”. Imagine my confusion.

David Johnson previously worked for the East Baton Rouge Parish Sheriff’s Office as a full-time deputy from July 1997 to May 2003 .

Congratulations, this is the dumbest comment I have ever seen on this website. I didn’t think it could be done, but you’ve done it. Feel free to clock out now.

an armed woman who is otherwise weaker, physically, than the unarmed man has just armed that man. Every statistic back that up.

I grew up in a household with guns. I am fine with guns. I would own a gun if I felt like I needed one.

I'm 27 and it didn't bother me at all! I spend way too much time obsessing over how every new musician and actress is younger than me, and how youth is glorified in this culture and old age is invisible (especially for women), and how George Harrison was my age when the Beatles broke up and Keats was two years younger…