Surprisingly pretty. Looks like the front of a Mazda 3 and the back of a Bentley. Which isn’t a bad thing in this case.
Essentially yes. The exception is that you couldn’t get it with a manual. It was also a bit heavier and softer. It fits the older Corvette owner demographic better than the Corvette itself.
Exactly. It’s a cruise missile not a sidewinder.
Probably at least 5 seconds slower around a 2-mile track too. These cars are for different demographics. A more likely cross-shopping comparison would be the Challenger R/T to the Mustang GT.
Is it just me or does this thing only let you choose the color and the cloth type? Where is my tan leather seats, red seat belts, carbon fiber trim, red tachometer, 5-spoke wheels and black exhaust tips???
Spot on.
This isn’t the latest Challenger.
This is not the current gen Charger.
Hunchback of Bavaria
I couldn’t disagree more. The XLR is one of my personal favorite vehicle designs from the 2000s.
Totally disagree. I think the CTS Coupe is a very clean design. Not over-styled with accent lines and overly molded stuff everywhere. The belt line could be lower I suppose but IDK how much of that is Cadillac’s fault vs. safety regs.
Also, if you live in a city where sports are big, make sure you know the local team’s home schedule, even if you don’t care about the sport itself. This will save you the horrible realization that the football game just got out right when you’re leaving the grocery store, making your drive back home 4-5 times longer…
This might be minor, but you need to know how the local weather patterns affect behavior. For example:
I’m sorry but the Mecan is still boring looking at best, downright ugly at worst. Granted, it is very hard to make a crossover look good. The problem is that it looks like a fat car, not a slim SUV. I can only name 3 crossovers that are actually good looking: Range Rover Evoque, Mercedes GLK and Lamborghini Urus…