Team Cat.

Ding, ding, ding!

I liked this Shakira better.

You sound too immature to commit to a lifelong legal partnership.

Totally can't tell if the header pic is a runway or a grocery store.

Yup.

Please tell me I'm not the only one who, every time I hear "Chrissy Teigen" is surprised when the person is not the one below.

BUT WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN?

Full waxing. Kids these days.

Right?! WTF

Some of us not only agree that sex workers have the right not to be the targets of the atrocious treatment you mention, but the right not to have to sell their bodies to exploitative men for money.

I actually LIKE Kim, but I think it's naive - and, on the part of self-proclaimed feminists, dangerously delusional - to pretend that this isn't escorting, that escorting isn't prostitution, and that prostitution doesn't necessarily involve exploitation. "Sex positive" choice feminism sets up this problem and provides…

But when you pimp your body and your time out for money, people (buyers; men; assholes; rich asshole men) assume they're buying the right to degrade you. Because you are FOR SALE.

Agreed. But what type of men buy women's bodies?

Cause that's what johns are buying when they buy women's bodies. That's the point. Always has been. To pretend otherwise is dangerously delusional "choice" feminism.

But Jezzies are CONVINCED that sex work is "just work."

But "escort" is a euphemism for "prostitute." Everyone knows that. And we don't know what previous "escorts" of Mr. Luger have, er. provided. Including the American socialites/starlets.

To my mind, the thing that's being missed from the "of course escort work is skeezy, she's asking for it!" vs. "sex workers are people and have rights and boundaries and should be respected" debate is that sex services, by virtue of the people who buy them, ARE inherently "skeevy" wherein "skeevy" is code for…

This is some real Daniel Deronda shit. Also, a fucking iron cross opera gown? In Vienna? Srsly Kimmie?