I think it suffered from the same problem as the first two Harry Potter movies (apart from the change in ending, of course): the movie covered every event that happened in the book and got everything right aesthetically, but failed to actually translate into a good film with its own unique point of view. I would have…

Unfortunately, I feel like the only person who could have best played Charles Wallace was Haley Joel Osment 15 years ago.

I like to think that Maggie learned about the reverse effects of ecstasy from personal experience.