I kind of wish they would’ve just made it a new IP rather than stir the pot and make a “half-life” game. It feels tacked on just to try to make a buck, like Artifact being based on DOTA.
I kind of wish they would’ve just made it a new IP rather than stir the pot and make a “half-life” game. It feels tacked on just to try to make a buck, like Artifact being based on DOTA.
The issue with Popeyes is that there are way fewer franchises compared to CFA and they tend to be exclusively in larger urban areas whereas CFA can be found in smaller locations. Their sandwich is better than the CFA one tho.
I enjoy eating there because I like chicken and only a small fraction of the $10 I spend will actually go towards the CEO. I drink Coke and buy gasoline so I don’t see why Chick-Fil-A should be an exception to the rule. With that said, their questionable donations do cross my mind whenever I eat there and this change…
Something tells me the types of people who are visiting a bar in Dubai probably aren’t gonna be getting very many free drinks with that kind of criteria.
I have a hard time experimenting with new cereal flavors compared to other weird new snack foods. Like if I buy a new flavor of Oreos or a new type of Mountain Dew and I don’t like it there isn’t much left. If I buy a cereal and dislike it then there is still a lot leftover.
Pokémon games never get bad reviews regardless of quality. Since the launch of the 3DS the amount of content and quality of the games has been steadily decreasing, but franchises like COD or Pokémon don’t ever get bad reviews even if the new entries lack features or content.
Or everybody who’s willing to pay twice as much for mediocrity from Game Freak in a world where BOTW, Mario Odyssey, etc are getting the most out of the switch.
I mean if we factor in tax then yeah it’ll be $40 but it also won’t be $60 either.
No people are going off of watching streams of people who have completed the games in under 25 hours as well as data mining.
Yeah the complaints are completely unwarranted. The mandatory exp share, lack of postgame content, lies surrounding the reason for cutting the roster, cutting of over 50 moves, lack of online trading, and other problems are made up.
It’s difficult justifying paying double the money for a game with half the content of previous installments while other AAA franchises push the boundaries of the Switch.
If you don’t plan on turning off the EXP share, trading online, or using all the Pokémon in the series then it’ll probably be an enjoyable game.
Or a “random episode button” for when you just want some randomized background noise
You also forgot to mention the lack of online trading, required exp share, audio control being locked behind a key item, lack of post game, over 50 moves being cut, tons of pokémon not being in the game, and various other issues but yeah it’s totally unjustified.
Yeah there would be tons of models to make for the world as well as new Pokémon. The problem is that in 2013 Game Freak created “futureproof” 3D models of every Pokémon that would be able to be use from here on out. These models were used throughout the entire 3DS series of games, in Pokémon GO, and in Let’s GO P/E.…
Maybe by the time it comes out Tom Holland will actually look the part of Nathan Drake. Seriously, Holland is a good actor but the youngest Nathan Drake could be portrayed is in his very late 20s. Maybe for a prequel it would work but I think they’re are better choices for the role.
But they didn’t, if anything it plays more closely to a game aimed at infants. They removed about 50 moves from the game which limits strategy even further. They also require you to have the exp share on so many streamers are showing that your pokémon are typically overleveled for the majority of the game, making it…
They also haven’t said we will get the rest of the pokémon down the road. For all we know this limited selection could be the new norm.
Yup, perfectly sums up the legitimate gripes people have with this game.
$60 as opposed to $30