Ridiculous hair-splitting is exactly what people do when they’re trying to walk something back. But note also there is no confirmation beyond rumors that she had ever made a final decision whether to print a name or identity. I’m not telling you I know what’s what here at all. I’m saying there’s lots of room for…

Well to be fair that’s kind of what the headline promised.

I have an idea:

I can see at least three ways to explain this without anyone lying:

I left out Oz - add Paul Hogan to my list. I mean seriously how ridiculous would “that’s not a kerfuffle - that’s a kerfuffle!” be?

Scams you need not avoid, ranked:

Get out of here with this, whether or not you have evidence. All the evidence I need is to picture Russell Crowe, John Wayne, Daniel Craig and Martin Short saying the word and it obviously makes sense only coming from the goofball Canadian.

Thanks for the sincere reply, despite its insulting intro (which to be fair I probably invited.) But you didn’t really do much to explain what you think the ideology is. When you tried, this is what you said:

“We sincerely apologize to anyone that was offended by the jerseys.”

I agree with all this stuff but what you are describing is not “resistance,” it is “disagreement” or if you like “criticism.” Resistance is applying actual counteracting force - in the real physical world, not inside your brain or on a page. People who stood on the edges of Tiananmen Square disgusted at what they saw…

Please explain to me what the ideology is in a way that makes it not about money.

After a quick check on eBay replacement drive prices ($30, not bad)

This tweet happened today but really it could and should happen every day.

The defendant’s deposition is gonna be kinda short:

You guys I need your help. I know Trump’s trip to Davos is part of a vast conspiracy but I can’t figure out whether he’s going to assassinate Soros or whether Soros tricked him into coming so he himself would be assassinated. I’ve got a hundo riding on it so if you could help me game this out I’d super appreciate it.

and you, certainly a real person, the 222nd fupa for god’s sake! - you delight in knocking them down! kudos and huzzah!

one thing was for certain though; in a comment section to an article written by this Schwartz fellow, there were no jokes that missed there mark; there was certainly no trolling, no troll-trolling, no troll-troll-trolling, no sir - it was the way of all such debates - there had to be a nazi somewhere ...

i became very disoriented; up was down - black, white - lies, truth - soon i truly could not tell whether the nazi was he or i

i tried looking in the mirror but there was a mirror behind me so it was just nazis all the way down

Shouldn’t she just get out there and play before worrying about the metaphysical implications - I mean isn’t she kind of putting Descartes before [ANVIL]