Here we have a very reasonable explanation of why you would be jealous and have hurt feelings. I probably would too. Your previous statements that “friends [/exes] aren’t supposed to do that shit,” though, implied that merely by having dated a person in the past you have some claim to control who dates that person in…

Please start all your statements with these same five words so the world knows to stop listening.

If you’re not claiming ownership, explain why “friends aren’t supposed to do that shit.” (Also - would you go to her house to beat the shit out of him, or would you behave like a reasonable really-really-pissed-off person and just declare him no-longer-a-friend?) And once you’ve explained that, then please proceed to…

If you’re going to write a comment like this, you really need to crawl into a hole and chew your own fingers off.

I can’t break it down in detail but the idea would be that they can see the “pot odds” whereas the public cannot; if the public’s betting heavily favors, say, Aaron Rodgers but his actual odds of outscoring Tom Brady are only slightly favorable, then a person betting on Brady stands to win big.

Sure, that’s what they’re putting out their through their media mouthpiece. The truth, as explained here by a young James Stewart, is much weirder:

This has to be Detroit’s worst illegal-batting-related injustice since the Vincent Chin murder trials.

“So no,” continued Bennett, “I really don’t think Jay’s too often criticized. He’s an unfeeling prick and he rarely does anything good.”

You know what this means right? In the hunt for maybe-Carlos-Baerga’s cell phone number we have narrowed it down to just 100 possibilities.

Needs more mean-mugging.

Simmons does podcasting as his job. I assume that like most other members of the labor force he would like to draw a paycheck from his job. His employer is probably unlikely to give him one unless his performance of his job has some value to the company, like say generating revenue that is greater or equal to the…

I’m not sure what you’re saying is “bullshit” - the post very clearly explains that it’s not clear whether the deception was intentional or not. But there is no denying that Jay successfully fooled not just the baserunners, but one announcer as well. Also - what other explanation is there for him holding onto the ball…

At first blush your comment makes sense, but may I offer as a counterpoint:

I came here to nominate Steve Bono, read your comment, and had to check Wikipedia to make sure you hadn’t just confused the two.

Can you help me decide between the following perfect “Jon Heyman” anagrams to tweet out?

So their site says this:

I’m not gonna go and count all the commas but that third one is just atrocious.

Yes. Baseball has existed for a finite period of time, and consists of discrete events, hence there must have been a first home run ever hit, which perforce was the first home run given up by whatever pitcher did so, as well as the first ever hit by the hitter thereof. QED.

Watching Blake Griffin and Chris Paul play basketball <i>would</i> be fun, if they would focus on their prodigious basketball talents and athleticism instead of constant flopping, whining and pouty faces.

Chris Speier