Sure, we could agree on that.

Fight evil with evil, fascism with fascist tactics.

UC Berkley’s isn’t legally allowed to discriminate a speaker invited by a student group based on the content of their beliefs. Even if actual Nazis showed up, they would have to allow them platforms.

Yes it is. Hate speech is free speech

Fight fascism with fascist tactics.

One of the worst things that has happened in our democratic discourse is what I like to call the “stupidman” fallacy.

Calling for violence to be inflicted on 10 year olds. That is a nice moral high ground you stand on.

Wow. The whole point of democracy is the disagreements are settled by debate and votes and not through violence.

The world is not divided between right wing white demons and lef-wing angels. In fact, that worldview is pretty much false because angels and demons exist on both sides, and there is more political diversity than just 2 perfectly opposite sides.

Here are anothe two facts to blow your mind:

If whitewashing = truth, then sure I was whitewashing.

Trump didn’t take them as slaves did he.

Keep on dreaming.

Does censorship work?

What?

There are multiple democratic institutions in our Republic. The political parties, primaries, and election are just small part of that.

That is just poor logic. One word can fundamentally change the meaning of a sentence. Adding a race to “right to life,” changes the entire concept of an universal inalienable right to life.

I would love to know how you define a crime, because the basic definition of crime has always been breaking the law. Overstaying visas, illegally crossing the border are all breaking the laws, so why aren’t they a crime?

Well to be honest, there are protests about pretty much everything. Before BLM, there were protests. There were protests during GWB presidency, and for all sorts of reasons.

There is a very strong agreement on 1st Amendment doctrine, with the exception of campaign contributions, in this Supreme Court. Both the conservative justices and the liberal justices generally agree on very broad defense of free speech.