One of the worst things that has happened in our democratic discourse is what I like to call the “stupidman” fallacy.

Calling for violence to be inflicted on 10 year olds. That is a nice moral high ground you stand on.

Wow. The whole point of democracy is the disagreements are settled by debate and votes and not through violence.

The world is not divided between right wing white demons and lef-wing angels. In fact, that worldview is pretty much false because angels and demons exist on both sides, and there is more political diversity than just 2 perfectly opposite sides.

Here are anothe two facts to blow your mind:

If whitewashing = truth, then sure I was whitewashing.

Trump didn’t take them as slaves did he.

Keep on dreaming.

Does censorship work?

What?

There are multiple democratic institutions in our Republic. The political parties, primaries, and election are just small part of that.

That is just poor logic. One word can fundamentally change the meaning of a sentence. Adding a race to “right to life,” changes the entire concept of an universal inalienable right to life.

I would love to know how you define a crime, because the basic definition of crime has always been breaking the law. Overstaying visas, illegally crossing the border are all breaking the laws, so why aren’t they a crime?

Well to be honest, there are protests about pretty much everything. Before BLM, there were protests. There were protests during GWB presidency, and for all sorts of reasons.

There is a very strong agreement on 1st Amendment doctrine, with the exception of campaign contributions, in this Supreme Court. Both the conservative justices and the liberal justices generally agree on very broad defense of free speech.

This is an argument that has never made much sense to me. The central disagreement with abortion seems to be over how do we define life.

As President he is bound by the constitution in ways that private citizens aren’t. That is what I mean. of course whether he is bound by law is entirely another matter. I was talking more about the principle of the matter than the specific context of Donald Trump

People should be punished for their actions, the intent behind them, and the consequences of those acts. They shouldn’t be punished for “thoughtcrime.”

Shorter Version:

Well the handle is supposed to be ironic.