Oh look its the "two wrong make a right" argument again. The unthinking laziness of it is just annoying

"Psychopathy is traditionally defined as a personality disorder characterized by enduring antisocial behavior, diminished empathy and remorse, and disinhibited or bold behavior"

Two words you normally don't associate with one another: Nazis and Empathy.

The Nazis were very popular within Germany when they were in power. They were psychopathic. So yea, psychotic people can have huge following

Well, the principal question regarding abortion is when does life begin? Does it began at conception or does it begin at birth? If the answer to this question is that life begins at birth, then abortion ought to be legal under all circumstances. If the answer is that it begins at conception, then abortion cannot be…

You have two fundamentalist group. One becomes violent because of an image they don't like, the other chooses to photoshop the "offensive" image. If all fundamentalist decided to express their disapproval in a "non-violent" manner, the world would be a lot better place.

That is really disingenuous picture. Police forces are not original to America. They were there in Europe long before America was even discovered by the Old World. The idea that police station were created for submission of black people is completely inaccurate. Police have a necessary function in a society - to…

What about adulterer atheists? What about adulterer atheists who specifically speak about "family values."?

this ruling is unprecedented given the same court's recent outlawing of homosexuality.

1) If there was "overwhelming violence" within Mexico, there woould be a great number of refugees from Mexico who would be granted asylum

Right 30,000 people die within the US because of Gunshot wounds. Is the US facing "overwhelming violence." This term has to be compared to other places and must be placed within context. Is the situation in Mexico as bad as Somalia, or the Congo. If you are going to suggest something like that you haven't read much…

I live in Chicago, and if you go over to our Southside, you will find a place that has a lot of violence. Now a lot of people cannot afford to move, but few who could would move to some place within the US.

If raising your kids in US is the most obvious, and presumably, the right option, then are those millions of families who have chosen to raise their kids in Mexico not making the right and obvious choice. If so this is simply ridiculous.

There is something called ASYLUM. If you reasonably fear for your life back in your country of origin, you can apply for Asylum. However, what you are suggesting is ridiculous.

The problems with prostitution do not go away simply because you legalize them. Case and point the Netherlands and Germany. Their problems with prostitution have either gotten worse or are no better than places where it is illegal.

Why?

So I just want to clarify that when you say "that drugs are still a problem in countries where they are legal [because] prevailing attitudes from people who visit that country to partake in what is illegal in theirs," what you are saying is the the problems with Prostitution in Holland are due to people who go there…

You should start somewhere because I seriously don't see any problem with that statement

So I think that this has been said here before, but in Britain when they say British Asia, they mean people of (usually) Indian and Pakistani origin/descent living within the UK. So the identification is in many sense arbitrary. Usually people are identified via geography or culture. What this does not amount to is…

No its a cultural distinction only in the US (Do you distinguish between Italian and French Culture, or can they be thrown together in a classification of European culture. I think that the problem is this idea that "There is only one racial group in a continent."