The number of people who still believe her in spite of all evidence that she lied is even more frustrating.
The number of people who still believe her in spite of all evidence that she lied is even more frustrating.
Oh honey, you have seen nothing. If you really feel like being angry/disgusted then visit 4chan’s /pol/ board, or Stormfront, or InfoWars, or even fucking FunnyJunk. They’re largely chock full of the most comical anti-semitism, racism, nationalism, and mysoginy that you can shake a stick at.
That was a school project that she got credit for and enabled her to graduate. So not trolling, just doing her schoolwork; you’re deluding yourself if you thought it was anything but attention seeking.
I understand it and still feel that way. Sometimes a pile of shit is just that, even when people try to insist that you don’t “understand”, where “understand” is code for “you agree with me”.
I hate the increasing prevalence of professional victims like Emma Sulkowicz and Sarkeesian, but what is far worse is how many people support them.
That;s equally stupid. Rape has a very clear definition.
By that stupid logic, no rapist who thinks his victim “likes it” actually is a rapist. That’s even worse than what the other guy thought initially.
That is pretty much exactly what happened. The fact that even the trigger happy campus couldn’t find sufficient grounds to expel the accused speaks volumes about the lack of evidence there was on all corners of these accusations.
Lol how did this make it out of the grays? There’s hope yet.
Consent is not nearly as complicated as people are pretending. Did they verbally or nonverbally say yes and they are of age? Go for it. Did they rescind consent verbally or noverbally during intercourse? You better pull out, because it is not longer okay. Shit is simple, and people are making an issue out of a clear…
If she put her video up on the internet then you have every right to look at it just like you can look at a girl’s butt as she walks by if she wears a tight miniskirt. Neither are assault, rape, or harassment. Crude, perhaps, but sure as hell nothing more. If I make a bunch of photo copies of my social security number…
Nah she isn’t a whore, but she is shamelessly exploiting her false accusation’s fame. She’s just an opportunist, nothing more.
You can’t rape by watching a video. Rape has a very clear and unambiguous definition, as do things like sexual assault. This is none of those.
The justice system never indicted the accused, and the university found insufficient evidence to take any disciplinary action in spite of extreme pressure to do so. Additionally, guilt has to be proven; even if you are correct, it’s wrong to instantly believe her accusation with the absence of any evidence but her…
Wow, the second person in the comments to realize that Emma Sulkowicz is actually a liar who is exploiting such a terrible thing as rape for fame? I am glad to see it. Since I’m in the grays I get ignored, but at least some semblance of reason breaks through occasionally.
Man there is no evidence that she was raped. All of this support for a clear liar does nothing but give ammo to the people who say “hur all accusations are wymin lyin to hurt men!” MRA goonbags feed off of this shit, and supporting a woman who made an accusation in spite of absolutely no evidence to support her, and…
I get it, but the meaning isn’t nearly as profound or complicated as so many people seem to be claiming. It’s a hackneyed “look at me!” porn art piece that rehashes modern art cliches from the ‘70s that have already been done to death. Her mattress deal was pretty stale, but this is kinda sad for a graduate.
There is zero support for her rape. None. I am all for giving accusers the benefit of the doubt, but that only goes so far as there is at least SOME evidence in support of their claim, not a vacuum of support and some evidence against their accusation. The woman is little more than a hack “artist” that exploited the…
I am still surprised that people support her accusations despite there being zero evidence.
“Troll” here just means “someone who doesn’t agree with me 100% on all topics” the majority of the time. I admit that I can come off as vitriolic myself, but I am unfairly dismissed as a troll the majority of the time even when I mostly agree with the people here. It’s just a buzzword used to shut down dissent.