Usually canned beans and tortilla chips. Cheap, high calorie, complete protein, high in fiber, and tasty. Usually I have salsa, sour cream, tomatoes, onions, peppers, or rice on hand as well to make it tastier, so it's a good all around "I'm broke as shit but I need food" meal. Another go to is ramen, but that isn't…

You seem to really dislike them and the author, based off of my impressions so far.

Holy shit, do you really not know what hyperbole or sarcasm is?

Tolerant? How is thinking you are dumb for saying something that anybody who knew the story would know somehow intolerant? Don't chuck random buzzwords around in an attempt to cover up being incorrect.

Even if that's true, that doesn't make her book any less religionormative. She didn't explicitly represent every religion. Not only that, but she didn't represent every race, so she is a racist too! She's literally worse than Hitler for this.

Well, good thing the books are still great regardless of whether you accept the word of the person that created the entire world. What really matters is whether you consider her opinion sufficient.

No, I am serious. It's not a fallacy, because where the fuck are my Atheists? That must be religionormative. She's a bigot I tell you!

They didn't include everybody though. Just off the top of my head, Native Americans, Atheists, Jews, and parapalegics, all were left out. Clearly it's because Rowling is a cisgendered bigot, right? Not at all because an author has no obligation to forcefully cram every single subset of the population into their…

Inclusion? Where is she expected to stop? How many people is she supposed to represent in her story just to make every single person like you that feels left out feel special instead? I don't remember Jews explicitly mentioned, or Atheists, or Native Americans, or any paraplegics, and yet I don't remember any of those…

If you read them then you'd realize that you're stupid, because there are very clearly several main characters that are black.

Why would an author who chooses to represent entire species that don't exist be bound by your expectations? It's fucking fiction for Christ's sake, it doesn't have to have them. And it did, it just didn't equally represent every single part of humanity explicitly, so you're mad because you feel left out or something?

Wow, I don't think I've seen people bitch this much about a book/movie series since the Hunger Games had that whole debacle about Rue being black (since she was black in the book and all). I feel like Rowling was damned with the whiney types here either way. If she said there weren't gay people, you'd flip out about…

Gay people by most estimates, are about 2-5% of the population. Why would such a small subset necessarily be represented in the main characters, especially when some did not even have their sexuality ever even referenced? It's unreasonable at best to expect every piece of literature to pander to a small subset of the…

"I think we can all feel comfortable believing this represents reality."

Do people like you even read the books before you start complaining, or are you perpetually grasping for things to be mad about even if you have no idea what you are talking about?

"straight, cisgender privilege"

Women fill traditional roles, but they are not kept there, which is an important distinction. Women are free to and even encouraged to do whatever the hell they want, which makes me think your claim of inequality is false. It's not inequality if they choose to be stay at home moms, but are provided the education and…

I feel like you missed that that was the point. The game meant to discourage using guns, as the focus was the parkour and running, not being another cookie cutter shoot-em-up. Adding in the guns more like you recommended would ruin what the game was in my opinion.

1. Puke bag.

Except that's painfully wrong. If Mirror's Edge was third person then it would have lost all of its unique perspective and feeling of momentum.