Maybe some here should investigate case law before making claims:

It’s funny to hear the left touting “Corporate Rights” When it goes in their favor. Rare too, because they think government should control everything. So confusing.

It’s funny to hear the left touting “Corporate Rights” When it goes in their favor. Rare too, because they think government should control everything. So confusing.

It’s funny to hear the left touting “Corporate Rights” When it goes in their favor. Rare too, because they think government should control everything. I am confused.

So the only corporation that should be controlled by the government is one the left disagrees with? Since Google discriminates it’s okay as long as it’s a conservative? Sounds like the left uses their platform only when it suits their needs.

It’s funny to hear the left touting “Corporate Rights” When it goes in their favor. Rare too, because they think government should control everything. So I am confused.

Just like the left stands silent when a Christian doesn’t want to create words on a cake that go against their own belief. The left cries louder and longer about the smaller things. If this were a leftist group that was banned there would be protests in the street. Conservative usually don’t protest, because they have…

Says a bigot.

Is it okay to discriminate against someone because of their religious belief and force them to create something that is against their faith? It is always about politics on the left and never about what is right or just. They side with evil every time. “You will know them by their fruit”

Boycott is a personal decision not forced by the government. Dicks is denying a legal person from buying something from their store that is legal for them to do, Like denying a person from buying something off the shelf because they are black or female or whatever you choose. A person can’t control their age. This is…

Poor analogy, because Alex Jones doesn’t tell people to kill anyone at random that I know of.

Free use or not, YouTube is a business. They shouldn’t be able to deny someone business based on philosophical differences or what they think is “truth” or not (law breaking aside). This is not unlike the Bakers that couldn’t deny Homosexuals business based on their religious belief. This will go to court and I hope…