Because GM and Fiat-Chrysler were notorious for shitty build quality until recent years (aside from trucks, of course). Honda has been consistently solid for much longer. Don’t think for even a second that they didn’t earn that reputation.

So what the hell was it that Jay Leno and Jerry Sienfeld were arguing about 9 years ago during the superbowl?

I have a slight suspicion that you meant to reply to a different comment than mine...

I bought one for the fuel economy, I’m strictly pissed due to the declined resale value.

Ain’t got shit on OT.

The motto of the 2017 Ridgeline team: “We can’t possibly sell fewer than the last one”.

Google amputated it.

Is that a front end loader being used to clear the entrance ramp, or just your average Canadian on his way to work?

The 1934 Chrysler Airflow.

You’re welcome to do the faster on paper number crunching, but to the rest of us, it’s obvious.

IIRC Uncle Rico had a high top Dodge. Lol. Then again, that movie wasn't shot too far away...

I would like to preface my sarcastic statement by saying that I really like Honda and the NSX. With that said...

Wow.

I had a G35C 6MT for a decade. Loved it. Switched to an E90 when the G was all clapped out because the Q50 was milquetoast.

You are one giant pussy sir, it only takes a little common sense to drive a 400 Hp car. I did today, in the rain. I'm still alive.

Please, show me an article where a member of the Jalopnik staff praises the new NSX. I’ll put my foot directly in my mouth if you can.

are you okay

Who I don’t want designing my car: an Ivy-league design school grad who networked his way into a big-3 job, and is always looking to build that resume and move on to the next big opportunity.

• "Fantastically good car"