I miss New York in eighties, dammit.

You’re the one framing it as incitement to protest. It’s incitement to break a lockdown in the middle or a public health emergency. An incitement to gather a bunch of maskless idiots together in one place to possibly inflame the current viral outbreak. So you’d be fine with the arrest if the woman had incited people…

She didnt “post about a protest”. She was the organizer and host of the event. She called the virus a hoax. She actively mobilized against measures in place to protect lives.
What a shitty take, Matt.

“...it’s hard to justify arresting someone and seizing all of their electronics simply for posting about a protest on Facebook.” Maybe not so hard - it’s an incitement to behavior that is counter to the health of the population during a pandemic. Victoria has been under strict lockdown for a month and she is…

Inspire should be fine. Or Alta HR, which is a flatter and more comfortable design.

. . . they make the case for adopting a more nuanced approach . . .

What an absolute piece of shit you must be

You’re either particularly dense or intentionally disingenuous if you think there’s no different between “cute shoes” and “sexy shoes”

Prudish test? I find it hard to believe you don’t understand the difference between someone saying “cute shoes” once and “those are sexy shoes. I am a sucker for sexy shoes” twice.
One is a compliment, the other is an advance. He was throwing that out there to see how she’d react. When he didn’t get the reaction he…

Again, what Patrick does away from her job as presenter does not matter when she is presenting. You don’t get to harass a woman just because you saw her half naked once.

The fact you define her posing suggestively as a poor life choice says more about you than her actually doing it.

I see what you’re saying, but choosing to pose for a risqué photo at 25 does not mean that’s the only thing that should define you when you’re 38. Even more overtly sexual professions like, say, nude modeling or burlesque dancing, don’t mean that those women should be treated sexually in other situations that don’t…

When Jeep’s first “Advantage” is heritage, my response is,

I get the frustration of not having Lyft and yes, that leaves people with one fewer option for getting around, and yes, they are being particularly pig-headed about it, but let’s not pretend that anyone has any entitlement to a ride-sharing service that didn’t even exist a few years ago.

Any reasonable safety system takes ordinary human behavior into account. Or, to put it another way, if humans were capable of behaving rationally and prudently all of the time, you wouldn’t really need robust safety systems.

I was thinking the same thing. I shelled out $20 for Trolls, then downloaded myself a copy. $30 bucks just to watch a movie I would not have seen in the theater anyways....yeah no.

the original clutch on his Frontier King Cab lasted 801,000 miles

As a lifelong car enthusiast with a bucketlist goal of owning a 911 GT3, it is necessary to look at this. Obviously things like this won’t apply to everyone (and will skew more towards densely populated urban areas), but the solution to a better future isn’t to double the amount of roads out there and increase speed…

I love cars and I enjoy driving, but sitting in traffic taking 40 minutes to get home from work isn’t driving.

It’s a fantastic idea honestly. And in no way inconsistent with being a car guy. As far as I’m concerned I’d love to avoid having to use a car for most day to day errands - keeping driving as something fun - on the track, on road trips, for the occasional blast along a winding road by the ocean. Then we wouldn’t need…