nickalexander01
Lionel Hutz
nickalexander01

Then I suppose you’ll be happy to hear that it was announced in Sept. that Armor Wars was being developed into a feature film, rather than Disney+ show. So, no, it’s not just a show to introduce new characters that might make a movie. Instead, it’s a feature vehicle for Don Cheadle to play Rhodey.

The no costume rule also comes from a place where Disney want’s its characters (who are an important face of the parks) to be played by employees and not random visitors treating a Disney-trip like comic-con.

And yes, US Bank already claims your money as theirs. Just look at their balance sheet.

You may think that, but you’d be wrong and don’t understand what “secured” and “unsecured” mean.

Sure, but that’s not what you wrote. Your article characterizes crypto deposits not belonging to the depositors as being untoward or underhanded, but that’s not the case. It’s standard practice for consumer deposits, even at ordinary consumer banks. Judge Glenn would almost certainly also hold that depositors to a

  • https://www.forbes.com/sites/rufaskamau/2022/06/01/people-misunderstand-cash-deposit-in-banking-and-ignore-bitcoin/?sh=19ed802d212b

You understand that this is the same for ordinary banks also, right? That when you deposit your money in a bank, you also don’t own the money in the account?

Or perhaps instead of killing him off or creating some complex explanation for his absence, Mutt is just an adult and off doing his own thing while Indy is on this adventure.

Even more Trumpy than you thought. He’s not selling these. He licensed his name/likeness to an NFT company that’s selling them. This is just Trump Steaks (and his so many other licensed products) all over again.

Not to be pedantic, but your response to Justin was prickish. He did answer your question. You asked if there were any hardware restrictions and he said there were. You did not ask what the hardware restrictions were.

Who’s to say he wasn’t invited.

My guess is that there’s some overwhelming threat to the Spider-Verse and Miguel convinces the Council of Spider-Persons (& Non-Persons) to go forward with a morally dubious plan to save the Spider-Verse (i.e., for the greater good). But, when Miles is brought in on the plan, he disagrees that they should go forward

The argument from AirTag haters is that AirTags check-in their location with any FindMy compatible Apple devices, which are extremely plentiful, nearby while Tiles only check-in their location with other Tiles, which are not plentiful.

If I were to guess, its a plot vs. character issue. GotG 2 is very light on plot; it’s a character piece. So, at the time of release, in Phase 3, when the MCU’s story was building towards Infinity War, rather than continuing the build up of Thanos (which GotG 1 touched on) GotG 2 takes a pause where “nothing really

11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6): claims arising from “willful and malicious injury by the debtor to another” are not dischargeable in bankruptcy by individual debtors (i.e., debtors that are humans not business organizations). This means that even if Jones successfully confirms a chapter 11 plan and emerges from bankruptcy, the

Sure, but the first two episodes do a pretty poor job at creating a hook. If you just watch the first two episodes, you see two meandering stories where not much plot-wise happens (lots of great character building), with no sign that episode 3 is going to have an actual conclusion.

I agree that they should release 1-3, but disagree on 4. 1-3 is a complete arc. 4 starts the second arc that ends with 6.

WB hasn’t broadcast anything in 16 years, since it merged with UPN in Sept. 2006 to form The CW.

CW / WB and UPN. The CW was the lovechild of WB and UPN, which merged in Sept. 2006. As I’m sure you’re aware, the “C” in CW is for CBS, which owned UPN at the time UPN went off the air (Sept. 15, 2006), two days before WB ceased (Sept. 17, 2006) and three days before The CW premiered (Sept. 18, 2006).

So does this mean Donkey Doug or Pillboi are going to show up in The Acolyte also?