Wow! The commenters made this about Apple quick. Neither company's perfect, but I have to give credit to Apple for implementing an audit much sooner than Samsung. Though its a shame that people are taking fictional, retracted reports as facts about Apple manufacturer labor conditions.

I don't judge a company's products by who they're suing. I'm a fruity guy so my fruity phone suits me perfectly. Being that my bachelors is in Philosophy, I know logic. Maybe you should read up on your logic, because insulting me does nothing to prove your argument. I prefer the iPhone, and i have my reasons. I'm…

When did Gizmodo become the home of Samsung fanboys? I just find it entertaining that a slew of commenters rush to Samsung's defense for an example that clearly shows some Sammy shadiness. These days, Apple can seem to do right according to most of the commenters here. I like Apple, but even I'm not oblivious to…

I'm not surprised. That type of function sounds like a form of piracy. It's one thing to give your music to someone, but no longer have access to that music. That'd be just like giving a CD. The legitimacy comes into question when you're copying your library over to someone else. I'm not really sure why this is…

I don't think there could be any outcome to the Apple v Samsung case that possibly pleases everyone. There are 2 very distinct opposing sides. Even if Samsung damages were $20 million, critics would find something to convince themselves it wasn't the right decision. More so than any tech company I can recall, …

Like I said, people are trying to see what they from the foreman's statement, but he specifically said the damages were not punitive in nature. What he meant was that they were going to be just, and not lenient. Though the magnitude of their willful infringement warrants such astronomical damages, they weren't gonna…

I think you're interpreting that scheme wrong. Yes, it was 3G, 3GS, 4, 4s, but the 4 is the only one of those indicative of its own generation. 3G/3GS were indicative of the 3G network. Without that modifying "S," one would expect from here on out that the name would signify the generation. Though I expect the next…

I didn't interpret those 4 words that way. In the context of that interview, he was saying that they weren't going to let patent infringement slide. Part of Samsung's argument was, "say we copied, and we're not saying that, we needed to copy to innovate." The jury's message was willful patent infringement comes at a…

That's my dream too. I will admit that it's a gimmick though, and may not warrant investment. I've already seen phones with transparent screens so it doesn't seem too far fetched.

I'm agree with this, but in reverse; I live in the US. My philosophy is that if you don't want me to pirate, then make it easy for me to buy. Read: If it's not on iTunes, it's fair game. So most UK and Australian TV and music that I want, I pirate. Also, networks like Showtime, that delay the digital release, also…

I don't like the album-only stuff, but I respect why it's done. iTunes has completely changed the music industry, because suddenly artists and labels must rely on single sales to cover their costs. Where I disagree with you is that it's more the norm, that I'd want a full album, than the exception.

Yeah, but they corrected themselves. I'm not saying Samsung has no chance, but they're not winning with that argument.

Why's that? I do enjoy the occasional skinny jean.

I switched from At&t and am happy I did. Nothing wrong with CDMA, and Verizon's future is GSM with their LTE network being GSM. I'm still using my Verizon iPhone when I go to Australia since it supports GSM as well. Just getting Verizon to unlock it for me. Their coverage is world's better than At&t in NYC. I…

People can call it whatever they want. I'm just giving my two cents that I don't call it that since the next iPhone won't be called the iPhone 5. Wasn't a big deal about the 4S, because it goes along with Apple's iPhone naming scheme.

I don't care all that much; they can call it whatever they want, but it is misleading. I think using iPhone 5 in articles just perpetuates the misnomer. I call it the new iPhone and get no complaints.

I don't like the big phones. I like the portability of smaller screens. Like I have no issue carrying around my iPhone in the gym, and sticking it into my waistband when I need both hands. If I decided to where skinny jeans, these bigger phones have no chance of fitting. For mobile video, I'd rather go with the bigger…

I beg to differ. There's a reason why Gizmodo has to do "meta-live" blogs of Apple events, and not live. ...because they weren't invited. But who knows. Maybe they're trying to get off Apple's poo-poo list and into their good graces. The Apple articles definately skewed negative for quite a while after Apple…

True, but to be fair, those racial stereotypes didn't come out off nowhere. I mean, I've never heard anyone say "that Asian guy has such a huge cock." Then again, I haven't heard anyone use that phrase regarding any race, but you get the point. Regarding white guys, the bottoms, from my experience, will fall short…

The phones that weren't included are still on Apple's radar. The judge just didn't have time to address the newer phones in this trial. Despite how great the latest phones may be, the 8 phones Apple is attempting to ban are all on sale and account for significant revenue and unit sales. Other Samsung phone's are still…