nic0-santiag0
Nic0-Santiag0
nic0-santiag0

I think the big question is what the Supra is supposed to be though. Is it supposed to be the halo car of the brand? Is it the “Corvette” of Toyota or is it the “Camaro”? I never thought it was intended to be the be-all end-all of Toyota’s performance line, more just a fun sports car. It’s never really been a supercar

But the NSX was never a Supra competitor. And the GT-R is in an entirely different segment now.

They did already: no stick shift

I agree. I would buy a CTR that looked like that. The racing crews know how to get it right.

No doubt I would buy this over the Ford Focus RS, Subaru WRX STI and VW Golf R.

And Tony Hawk Underground.

I think you’re exactly right about the new Bronco being a rebadged Everest.

Maybe if we revisit the site enough GM will bring them back?

I’m still sad about Pontiac. They never got the chance to really show what they could do.

now to find one in Black Rose Metallic...

...lol

Sure.

Yeah, but maybe it’s better than an entry-level 3 Series.

I would like to know why people buy production cars and act like they are unique or “different”. If you didn’t build your car you are not unique. If you did buy your car you are probably still copying someone. The reason to buy a 460 HP rwd manual car for 40-47k is self explanatory... I mean if you are on a site like

“Spoiler delete” was also an option.

But was it stable enough at highway speeds to do coke off the dash?

A better comparison for your All-trac would be an Eclipse.

If loving a red interior is wrong, I don’t want to be right.....

When I got it had ~60,000 miles on it. When I sold it, it had 180,000 miles on it. I never had turbo issues.

My buddy in college drove a 3000GT of the VR-4 variety. He loved it. About eight years ago, he finally ditched it and bought a red NSX from a guy in Kansas. On the trip back to his home in Dallas, he confirmed that the Acura rode quite well on extended stretches of 130 MPH (just like the VR-4).