I’d just like to point out that the morning after the women’s final, I was threatened here with a commenting ban because I disagreed with the author and deigned to say that Serena was wrong and Ramos was doing his job. That seemed a little short-sighted/heavy-handed, given that the author believed a verbal abuse…

This is an outrageous bit of skill roofing the backhand, obviously, but the context is what makes this my favorite: Karlsson did his between-the-legs move the night before, and Giroux somehow had the the balls to go for this in overtime of a big game, realizing that Khudobin also had just seen Karlsson’s goal that day…

Well, national anyway.

What do you find objectionable about changing

“And so, in conclusion, it is my opinion that the third way to kill a mockingbird was the best of the book. The others seemed like they would be too hard. Thank you.”