newaroundhere
NewAroundHere
newaroundhere

I agree and disagree, if that makes sense. That quote is accurate, but the United States is more complicated than just that. Our culture, our diversity, our Constitution, we aren’t one thing. So a lot of people want to immigrate here. The problem is that one part of our psyche, the imperialism, is at war with the

You are very right, except about IS. An Iranian general's assassination is not IS recruiting material, it's Hezbollah recruiting material. 

LOL, nice try but modern Republican votes will never permit themselves to believe even for a second that the U.S. might possibly be beholden to international laws or norms in any way. I still remember trying to explain to those dumbasses during Obama’s Syrian “Red Line” fiasco that Syria wasn’t a signatory to the

Someone probably pointed out how, other than Mar-a-lago maybe, his hotels are extremly soft targets.

They don’t seem to get that Iran is a country. This isn’t like killing some ISIS leader, this is like killing a Secretary of State.

My First Blood-Bath Book? Sorry, couldn’t help myself.

I thought the same thing. I hate that she even answered It. 

Precisely.  Like torture.  When they approve torture; they are approving torture of Americans captured too.

Also, my dear republican “friends”, if WE can assassinate someone WE consider a bad man, THEY can assassinate someone THEY consider a bad man.

Also, does botox count as a skin routine?  Cause Joe, honey, your facelift was bad enough, but the botox.  You gotta cut back. 

Literally every president since Eisenhower would be open to assassination if the world held the US to the same standard Trump used to justify the attack.  

Of course not. Don’t be silly!

Ugh, has anybody asked Biden or Sanders their skincare routine?

So apparently it’s “okay” to assassinate a general from a sovereign country that we aren’t at war with, by saying “he was a bad man”. Are we going to drop bombs on Kim Jong Un, Vladimir Putin and anyone else we please in contravention of international law and commit war crimes under the auspices of “he’s a bad man”

Honestly wondering, if it had been Michelle Obama coming for the vapes would you all would have had the same shitty take on this?

I literally came here to say, “I can’t believe this is the hill you want to die on.” And seriously - it’s like you’re trying to convince us that since Melania is telling us we shouldn’t vape, we all have a duty to go out there and RESIST by vaping 24-7. I’m beginning to think you’re just trolling us at this point. 

Counterpoint: Fuck vapes.

This is not the hill you need to die on or maybe you will with your bubble gum flavored vape pen clutched in your cold lifeless hands. Good luck.

Can the GMG please just stop with any/all vape coverage? It’s always a hopelessly vague yet narrow take on an issue that has career public health professionals scratching their heads over the best approach re: we need to decrease vaping without increasing cigarette smoking. Leave this one to the professionals. Also,

Agreed about the last email needing to be the first.