The (pretty foolish) perception he’s putting forth is that he’s fooled the courts into thinking he’s bankrupt, but still wants to show the public he’s rich.

So what? That was the first thing I thought, too. I’d still fuck her.

I remember when progressives didn’t believe in the concept of “evil.”

She killed him as much as he killed himself.

Not on Gawker. Emotions above all else!

I mean, I just can’t even.

She hasn’t killed.

Fuck this girl, she should remain in prison for the rest of her pathetic life.

Exactly. It’s nice to see someone thinking with something other than sheer emotion.

When one person bullies another into suicide using social media and other means, people in general agree they should be culpable.

Especially considering how the Academy doesn’t give a fuck about Latinos and Asians:

Related:

Never forget, Gawker Media is 79% white.

Yup. Gawker Media is 79% white.

I thought this when I read the article too. Maybe they aren’t speaking up b/c every time they do there are 1,000 articles about how they said this or that wrong?

If you know that you aren’t racist and want to help then being called racist is not the end of the world.

How does one “amplify their voice/message” though? That just sounds like meaningless platitude to me.

I think the larger point, which Rich might not’ve even been aware that he was making, is that taking any part in this deeply racist society of ours is in effect a racist act, whether we want it to be or not.

Listen to the experiences and needs of people of color, work to amplify their voices, and explain why those needs are important to other privileged people who are blind to them.

Latinos are represented way less at the Oscars than black people, and Asians are practically non-existent.