Idiots is the right description of those folks

I think if they repudiate the sale by countering with an extra markup, take it or leave it, I think according to contract law they must give the deposit back

Yep. Frickin Kia and Hyundai were/are doing that with Stingers, Telluride's, and the like

Nah, this is just a dealer repudiating a contract. The situation you mention is not even close to the same. Here, you sign a contract for a car, and off to the order books it goes. Car comes in, dealer says “I’m altering our deal. Pray that I don’t alter it further.” You’ve already had the deal; the dealer is just…

Aint no car worth putting yourself in a worse financial situation than if you just said “no”.

I’m the guilty party. I’ve been a fan since its inception, and still watch it or its ridiculousness.

Hahahah!!!! So true!

Why shouldn’t it be? It’s a stupid, ugly car that, rightfully, belongs to an age that we should move away from, car technology-wise.

I’m not too keen on this no-haggle nonsense, as it seems a surefire way to build in extra profit and there isn’t jack you can do about it.  Sure, haggling is not fun for most, and likely very irritating, but imagine the irritation people will have when the “Market Value Added Markup” becomes a permanent thing....

The difference being you don’t sit for hours inside your washing machine in a good/crappy/excellent seat in commuter traffic, nor does it play music through good/great/crappy audio system, and I’ve never had to pay more than $1000 for a NEW washer.

You aren’t crazy. Buying something like a car is a huge expense, and something you will have to live with for quite some time. If you haven’t driven it, experienced how you feel, see, and operate the car, I don’t know how you’d commit to a multi-year “relationship” with the car with a substantial financial outlay.

The white lines define the racetrack, not the sausage kerbs.

Running laps doesn’t make you a candidate for top-level racing.

That’s a pretty stupid excuse to construct for Verstappen. “They were racing each other”, therefore, basic human decency goes out the window?!?

Wen they wave a blue flag at them, basically. Otherwise, fighting for position, they can defend responsibly.

I don’t know “not something structural” but he comes off and an Orange Army fanatic, where EVERYTHING MAX DOES IS THE GREATEST BECAUSE HE’S A FUTURE WORLD CHAMPION AND THE BEST SINCE....EVER. Putting this on Hamilton more than Max is the height of idiocy. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, all the way up to…

That woman won't come remotely close to 30 years in prison for that incident. Guaranteed

The Peugeot 905 and 905bis were NOT Group C cars. They were classified as WSC cars under the 3.5 liter formula, along with the Jaguar XJR14 and Mercedes C291. Group C cars were the older turbo and large displacement NA cars, which were allowed to compete in the WSC in 1991 but with restrictions.

Yep.  This is clearly a move to secure a young driver when Hamilton retires, as that event is coming fairly soon.  I don’t think Hamilton is worried about anything, as everyone starts from zero next year.

Allow me to retort!Most polarizing vehicle is obviously the Pontiac Aztek.