neuroticmoose
Neuroticmoose
neuroticmoose

I felt like Deadpool did a better job with nailing down the tone, but I agree, there’s always been something about that one that also felt kind of off. I don’t hate either movie by the way, it’s one of those cases where the fan reactions tended to be just completely overblown compared to what was actually in the

It depends on your definition of a zombie, although that concept has been exponentially widened in recent years, I would absolutely consider Evil Dead to feature zombie or zombie-like monsters, they’re called Deadites and are basically reanimated corpses, that says “zombie” to me, even if they became more varied as

Um, The Evil Dead movies? Slither?

I might actually watch that.

Haven't you seen Last Man On Earth? Cher died in her mansion in Malibu, and she looked great.

For real though, even in abysmal schlock he's been nothing but a joy to watch onscreen.

Woody Harrelson has never been small, it was the movies that were small.

I've always described it as basically a really middle of the road indie comedy mixed with a really middle of the road zombie movie, but somehow mashing those two together really resonated with people who saw it. I'm right there with you honestly. The cameo felt like little more than an unearned victory lap that didn't

You’re not being a dick, but I was referring to his review of Kids, not this movie.

Revenge of the Nerds has aged poorly, but I still can’t imagine that being anyone’s takeaway from that film. The jocks are clearly depicted as idiot douchebags who can’t keep their girlfriends satisfied sexually, in fact they’re so bad at sex that it makes their significant others excuse the act of being raped simply

The MPAA’s ratings system is a gigantic steaming pile of horseshit, in any other first world country something with those elements would get a rating for teenagers to be able to view it.

Roger Ebert’s review noted that even if the subject matter was pretty adult, that he felt kids that age absolutely SHOULD see it, and that it may even save someone’s life. It’s like the filthy, grounded, bleak answer to the schmaltz of an after school special.

In a literal sense, three years IS years ago, but in a figurative sense after 2016, 500,000 years might as well have passed, because it’s been that kind of couple of years.

I think that maybe building an actually good movie around him might be a good start, instead of just mindless schlock after mindless schlock. He did some social media marketing in the lead up to Rampage in which he seemed to describe a completely different movie than the one that was actually made, and talked about

I think the problem isn’t that he always plays The Rock (although I thought he was serviceable in the scenes where he needed to be dramatic in Moana, he really sold that character IMO) but that almost no one he has ever worked with knows how to properly utilize him, Tom Cruise is always Tom Cruise in movies, John

A lot of the movies you mentioned at least have the good sense to be completely ridiculous, very watchable trash, The Rock’s career can’t even manage that. Almost all a bunch of lowbrow snore fests or middle of the road action schlock that he's absolutely great in, but that largely don't properly utilize his talent as

He has a beard in like, 80 percent of his roles, to the point it was unnerving seeing him without one in Star Wars.

Pissing his pants, but yeah still...

I thought Jesse’s best friend was the ghost of John Wayne

Historically, making big sweeping changes in a miniseries before starting work on the main title dictates the direction of the main title entirely. Just because they didn’t do that as much in the 70's and 80's (Though they still totally did if we’re counting things from the 80's like Crisis or Secret Wars) doesn’t