Counterpoint:

We didnt say anything when that lying lazy idiot before him was in office.

There’s definitely absolutely a double-standard when it comes to corruption though. Republicans get away with corruption because it’s expected of them. Democrats are expected to be responsible and care about good government, so any hint of corruption is treated as a major story.

There’s definitely absolutely a double-standard when it comes to corruption though. Republicans get away with corruption because it’s expected of them. Democrats are expected to be responsible and care about good government, so any hint of corruption is treated as a major story.

No it would not be like saying that because one would be an accurate description of True Detective whereas the other would be an inaccurate description of Breaking Bad.

I jumped on the True Detective train when it started, but I’m convinced now that it was actually Not Good and we the prestige-television-watching-public were simply taken by the lovely production and the undeniable genius of pairing Woody Harrelson and Matthew McConaughey. The writing was pretty shit.

Your sentence is a little hard to parse but I think you’re saying that the Nats have achieved more than the Expos ever did. Which is indisputably true, but they’ve still never won shit, and even when they do well in the regular season and look like champs on paper, they always find a way to lose. Look, I’m a Braves…

Still the fucking Expos.

I have a very hard time taking advice from anyone who uses “creative” as a noun.

Also, why is it our responsibility to respond to Trump’s hate and ignorance with understanding? Why doesn’t Kanye ask Trump to “try love?” Why should Trump not have to account for his words and actions? Just easier to punch down I guess?

She is wildly incorrect—some might even say foolish—to downplay the significance of Ocasio-Cortez’s win.

Digging that avatar.

I don’t care how they selected the target. There’s no way they can know how a person will react in an emotionally stressful situation like that. And great, they were trying to prove a point about human behavior. So what? The problem is the ethics (or lack thereof) of using a person to demonstrate that behavior without…

On most occasions, he tells you what he’s going to do to someone, does that thing, and then tells you why it worked that way.

He’s the one in the black 76ers tee? If so, that jumper looks night-and-day better than the video I saw previously. There was still some weird hitch in the set shot though.

Imagine being the type of person who would spend $130,000 of their own money to cover for Donald Trump.

Poor fucking Neymar.

a daily stoic

Apologies for being pedantic, but I think you mean “red herring” instead of “macguffin.” A macguffin is something being sought by the heroes, with the idea being that it really doesn’t matter what it us, as long as it works as motivation for the characters. A red herring is an element in the story that draws the…

Has that last guy never heard of a fucking plunger?