@blash: Sorry, I should have made it clear: I'm running Mac OSX, which is also not supported.

@blash: Thanks for the rehttp://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/comment/17/2011/01/9c55ac048633f00dcccf51f6f616e3.../original.jpgply.

I have Verizon high speed internet, which should give me access to their wireless hotspots for free. However, when I try to sign up for the service, Verizon says that they only support non 64-bit windows.

I'm not well versed in proper survey writing, and I understand that you are not trying to be scientific, but the phrasing of your question seems loaded to me. I want to automatically answer "yes," because I have an inherent mistrust of corporations that know so much about me. That has nothing to do with whether I…

This resonates with my own experience, but I will add that it is difficult to interpret studies like the one quoted here. The monetary rewards are usually relatively small. I may be unmotivated when I'm only going to earn an extra few dollars, but what if they offered me a few extra thousand dollars?

@jupiterthunder: Yeah, how about when a house is listed as (X)99,995? Hey, it's less than (X+1)00,000! Apparently, it affects how people increment their bids; I think their was a lifehacker post about this effect 999 days ago.

@PsyberS: Admittedly, I didn't read the article, but sample size alone doesn't tell the whole story. It depends on how significant the effect was, how many hypotheses they were testing, etc. I don't think it's fair to rule out a study by sample size alone, it's more subtle than that.

@gerrrg: According the snippet, both groups ate roughly the same amount of calories per day.

@jktechwriter: I think you are mistaking my comments for someone else's. I never advocated that it was okay to use the cost saving technique. In fact, I started my comment by saying that I don't want to advocate it. My point was that it's silly to be so upset at people who may be stealing a few bucks from the…

@DigThatFunk: Well, I started my comment by saying that I don't want to promote unethical behavior. My main point concerned users that were making a big deal out of people doing something mildly unethical when these companies do something grandly unethical.

@jktechwriter: I wouldn't want to promote anything unethical either, and this is off-topic, but there are a few replies holding us, consumers, to an ethical standard. But how about the companies' ethical standards? They are willing to take small business grants and loans, bailouts, and other ludicrous tax breaks,…

@EnderWiggin831: I agree with MosesMonster; it's the carpenter that should be blamed not the hammer. I'm curious: what do you use instead?

@kjf: It's not as if the author of the post tried to pass the work and the book off as her own. If anything, she is doing the author a service with free advertisement. I don't get your concern here.

Wow, the person on the video talks way too fast.

I just learned about the following themes for firefox that save on vertical space:

@sean000: totally agree. Especially, if you plan to shoot indoors with unpredictably moving subjects (like kids). So many times, I have simply "run out of space" inside; that is, I can't move back any farther then I need to get the right composition; you can always move closer on a shorter focal length if need be.

@David Ankers: Hi David, I disagree with your advice. Provided we are talking about *beginning* photographers, I think it is more important to learn subject, lighting, and composition.

Good to see that Ken Rockwell can be a lightning rod for something other than photography :) I used to not like him, but then I read more of his site, and I figured out that he takes nothing seriously.

@ilovetofu: "I also score my receipts when I go shopping, and assign grades to my purchase items depending on whether they're needs or wants ('A' for produce, 'C' for junk food, 'F' for toys, etc). If my overall score isn't a failing grade, then I know I'm doing okay."

Vote: Pandora