That’s not how this works, lol.

Naw, it’s rich people’s math. She leveraged a million dollars. Poor people don’t have a million dollars.

An here I am hoping that Congress passes a Capital Gains tax that would screw all these people out of this loophole.

“Most DOT requirements and case laws suggest that any man-made or man-placed objects near a roadside need to be designed within reason to protect drivers from significant injury.”

I truly don’t understand how you can hit these. Granted, I learned to drive in the city so I have experience squeezing my first vehicle (a 93 Buick Lesabre) into some tight spots, but this doesn’t look that tight, not even close. If that many people drive without looking where they’re going, I’m scared to get on the…

“I will dismiss any post that that blindly states that drivers deserve it”

me too! sounds are just sooo awesome... some cars actually squeak!

72 inches is six feet.  84 for 7.  That is at least 7/8 of a hogsbead.

TikTok, Boomer.

most people have no idea where the corner of their cars are 

How the hell are drivers meant to get through that while texting? It’s government gone mad, completely out of touch with road users’ Instagram-watching needs.

I can’t understand how its those tiny city cars that are having trouble fitting through 7 feet of space.

“seems” is doing a lot of work there, I think this clearly shows people have no concept on how to drive.

This is somehow still not helping me understand what people are having difficulty with here.  Are they just driving along the sidewalk and surprised when they hit these not-insignificant poles?

Seems like a bunch of people don’t know how wide their vehicle is, and the width restrictor is giving them a lesson with devastating efficiency.

I don't see any issue with it. Obviously people that doesn't know how to drive. 

It does seem like a convenient work-around for him to take his salary in stocks instead of cash-money so that it’s already taxed less than a salary, and then just never pay the tax on it by never withdrawing it as cash-money.

I’m not saying it’s a good idea - but your examples don’t work.  The linked article specifically noted that principle residences (so, your house), and 401ks would be exempted.  

Per NPR this morning, “The tax proposal would apply to just about 700 taxpayers.” Unless you are one of those 700 I wouldn’t be too worried.

Oddly enough, as a regular person with a regular job, I pay quite a bit of my income in taxes, percentage-wise. Somewhere to the tune of nearly 30%, between federal and state (not including sales, etc.).