People wrote in fucking Harambe for President, for Christ’s sake. A dead gorilla got 11,000 votes in this election.
People wrote in fucking Harambe for President, for Christ’s sake. A dead gorilla got 11,000 votes in this election.
We can hope for the legitimacy of these posts, and I’m sure there are dummies of all political stripes who didn’t realize registration is a prerequisite. Nonetheless, it is trolling at a pretty high level if that’s all it turns out to be.
“What do YOU mean, ‘you people’?”
No, I meant the second woman after Navarro... the one with her eyes closed.
My favorite is the second woman (I don’t know her name), who looks like she’s listening to her favorite song.
I’m just gonna leave this here:
“Did you see the video? The iguana screamed at the snakes. They wouldn’t put the camera on the snakes. They kept it on the iguana. If I screamed at the iguana as much as the iguana did at the snakes, they would say, ‘The snakes’ jaws became unhinged.’ He spent so much time screaming at the snakes. Frankly, it was a…
X.
How dare you post this without the accompanying video:
Meanwhile, Rangers fans keep reminding us they won a Stanley Cup in 1994.
As a hockey fan, I’m looking forward to five years from now when they start reminiscing about the Blackhawks being a good team.
I came here for this debate and was not disappointed.
So, she’ll be confiscating her husband’s phone and washing his mouth out with soap... when?
+1 threw up in my mouth.
You, they say kids whose fathers didn’t give them enough Huggies turn out to be troubled later in life.
LA Kings/Liverpool/Angels. I’m an Orange County native, but got into hockey more than 10 years prior to the Ducks’ existence, and I wasn’t going to change allegiances. I was 30 years into my Kings fandom before they finally won a Cup, but the year the Angels won the World Series, I was living in Arizona while…
Clearly, you haven’t talked to Blackhawks fans.
They just became the Midwest equivalent of Red Sox fans.
The order pretty well spells out what the judge wants to see, which is basically a summary of the facts underlying the plainitff’s case and the defendant’s defenses to the claim.