Right Wingers are the biggest snowflakes on the fucking planet I swear lol.

““None of us are that stupid.””

oooh, slow down there for a moment, hon.

I really just hope for the worst for every single one of those parents being shitty to this kid. Just utter trash people acting like utter trash.

/deepsigh

People who like to abuse people, like to be in positions that allow them to abuse people.

The artist doing the live stream of drawing of a copyrighted character did indeed violate the rights of the copyright holder. It is up to the copyright holder to decide what to do in that instance. Many corporations are fine with it as long as the profits aren’t that large because they understand fandom if free…

The more Meta and metaverse shoots itself on the foot, the funnier it gets.

PlayStation Home was better and more affordable.

They do work with Oculus. It’s just a weird set up where you’d have to run both runtimes which gives kind of a performance hit. That said, Meta’s run for LEGS is them attempting to use inside out tracking instead of the posistional (which is what the Vive trackers use) tracking to track legs. The problems with that is…

“But there’s something especially funny about this in particular”

This. I smelled BS from the moment I saw it.

Get ready for the apologists guys, you’ll eventually encounter some of them around.

I knew something was fucky with that video. You don’t get legs like that in VR without full-body tracking, whether it’s something like the Vive trackers or SlimeVR.

Yes but the AI art could only be published first in this case because they were able to screen cap an in-progress view of the live streamed art. If it weren’t streamed, then the AI generated art couldn’t have been posted before the artist’s work in the first place.

Looks like somebody’s about ready to ride ze shoopuf.

Racist gatekeeping nerds are the most fragile fucking losers on Earth.

What about an image in which the Microsoft logo is a monster trying to assault a feminine figure? Does that help illustrate the nuance at play?

I see you actually read the whole piece with a critical eye and comprehension. Kotaku wasn't counting on anyone actually doing that, they assumed you'd just react to the headline.

Reading through all this and the quotes I’m somewhat confused as to the order of events as it’s seemingly reading like:
- It was a reasonable place to work
- Microsoft bought it and left the old manner of working in place thinking “it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”
- CEO who got paid stopped giving a shit and brought in a…