Yeah but they were caught in a slow motion time warp. It's how the dragon got there so fast in spite of being like 3000 miles away.

I don't know what you're talking about. Episode 6 was full of subtlety. I bet you were surprised by that bear! And I bet you weren't expecting the dragons eye to be blue! And when Dany swooped in and saved them, nobody saw that coming from 1000 miles away, no sir.

It's just a joke. There's a trend of the most die-hard male feminists turning out to be scumbags, while people falsely accuse everyone they don't like of being a "MRA".

Further proving that there is something worse than an MRA, a male feminist.

"Disgraced" is an interesting word, considering he still gets more views on a single video than this whole site probably does in a month.

Biologists don't determine what is and isn't extremism, they just study what is biological and report their findings. Your analogy is nonsensical, it would be more like saying "The sky was blue today, so it will probably be blue tomorrow." Obviously that's not always true, it's often grey, sometimes pink and orange…

My understanding is that "agree in part" was self reported.

I'm sorry if it came across as something other than that. While Google might not condone such things, they don't actively stop their managers from doing so. As someone who works in tech, I've been told from the second I decided to do so that I need to watch what I say because I may end up blacklisted from the industry…

I agree, we should let women (and men) work in whatever positions they are qualified for and wish to do. If that means that 80% of the tech force is male, I support that. If it means it's 80% female, I support that as well. The argument is that current Google culture is set up to attract men at higher rates than…

I'm not entirely sure what your comment is in reference to, but I'm not ok with people being fired for expressing opinions that go against company culture, whether that means left, right, or whatever.

Whatever the case, this guy is no extremist. Most of his viewpoints are mainstream. He has pretty strong support from Biologists and Evolutionary Psychologists. The majority of the company believes it was wrong to fire him, and there's data out there to suggest that most might actually agree with him in part.

I've asked this repeatedly and have yet to have received a response: If Google sets up an internal forum for the discussion of their diversity initiatives, encourages everyone to provide feedback, and I believe their initiatives are illegal, immoral, and ineffective, I should be fired for stating so?

Are you saying people wouldn't be shamed and fired, or that those wouldn't be the top questions? Most sources seem to confirm that they were the top voted questions.

Which of his suggestions to improve diversity are you claiming are "illegal, ineffective, and immoral"?

Just so we are clear, I think you're a piece of shit.

Programming positions? One of his suggestions was to set up teams where people could work cooperatively as opposed to competitively. Frankly, that sounds good to me, I'd rather work on one of those teams.

Depends on how much the loading dock pays. I used to do that myself, but got sick of living paycheck to paycheck.

It's rather odd for such a manifesto, claiming women shouldn't work at Google, to include suggestions on how to increase the amount of women working at the company.

https://www.inc.com/sonya-m…

No. I know some who do, as well as Amazon, Microsoft, and a host of other tech companies.